| 21 |
When it’s harder to ignorar than to ignore: Evidence of greater attentional capture from a non-dominant language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 22 |
When it’s harder to ignorar than to ignore: Evidence of greater attentional capture from a non-dominant language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 23 |
Supplemental_table – Supplemental material for When it’s harder to ignorar than to ignore: Evidence of greater attentional capture from a non-dominant language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 24 |
Supplemental_table – Supplemental material for When it’s harder to ignorar than to ignore: Evidence of greater attentional capture from a non-dominant language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 25 |
On Language and Thought: Bilingual Experience Influences Semantic Associations
|
|
|
|
In: J Neurolinguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 26 |
Maternal scaffolding styles and children’s developing narrative skills: A cross-cultural comparison of autobiographical conversations in the US and Thailand
|
|
|
|
In: Learn Cult Soc Interact (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 27 |
Cognitive and Linguistic Predictors of Bilingual Single-Word Translation
|
|
|
|
In: J Cult Cogn Sci (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 28 |
Native Language Similarity during Foreign Language Learning: Effects of Cognitive Strategies and Affective States
|
|
|
|
In: Appl Linguist (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 29 |
When It’s Harder to Ignorar than to Ignore: Evidence of Greater Attentional Capture from a Non-Dominant Language
|
|
|
|
In: Int J Billing (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Imagine you’re driving and you become so distracted by the radio that you miss your turn. Which is more likely to have caught your attention, a broadcast in your native tongue or one in your second language? The present study explores the effect of language proficiency on our ability to inhibit irrelevant phonological information. METHODOLOGY: Participants were asked to identify which of two drawings changed color while ignoring irrelevant words in either their native language, English, or a less proficient language, Spanish. The drawings appeared on screen for either 200 or 2000ms prior to word-onset, which was followed 200ms later by a color-change. On critical trials, the irrelevant word shared phonological features with the label of the non-target drawing. Trials were blocked by preview time and language. DATA AND ANALYSIS: Reaction time data from 19 bilinguals were analyzed utilizing generalized linear mixed-effects models, with fixed effects of Competition (competitor vs. control), and Language (English vs. Spanish) and random effects for Subject and Item within each preview window. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: No interference was observed when participants heard their native tongue in either preview condition. However, participants in the long-preview condition were significantly slower to respond when there was phonological competition in their less proficient language, despite the fact that the task required no language processing. ORIGINALITY: Past work has indicated that languages are processed more automatically and cause greater interference as proficiency increases. We propose that though higher-proficiency languages may receive greater activation overall, lower-proficiency languages may be more likely to exogenously capture attention due to both relatively greater salience, and relatively less control. SIGNIFICANCE: The present findings have implications for how we understand the dynamic relationship between language proficiency, activation, and inhibition, suggesting that the salience of the less familiar influences our ability to ignore irrelevant information.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737858
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963402/
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920915277
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 30 |
Measuring Bilingualism: The Quest for a “Bilingualism Quotient”
|
|
|
|
In: Appl Psycholinguist (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 31 |
Listening to Speech and Non-speech Sounds Activates Phonological and Semantic Knowledge Differently
|
|
|
|
In: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 33 |
The case for measuring and reporting bilingualism in developmental research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 34 |
From Klingon to Colbertian: Using Artificial Languages to Study Word Learning
|
|
|
|
In: Biling (Camb Engl) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 35 |
Language Difficulty and Prior Learning Influence Foreign Vocabulary Acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 37 |
The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later
|
|
|
|
In: Biling (Camb Engl) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 38 |
The Case for Measuring and Reporting Bilingualism in Developmental Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 39 |
Learning and processing of orthography-to-phonology mappings in a third language
|
|
|
|
In: Int J Multiling (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
