21 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders: Error categories and the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
22 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders: Error categories and the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders: Error categories and the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders: Error categories and the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders: Error categories and the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Polysyllable productions in preschool children with speech sound disorders : error categories and the framework of polysyllable maturity
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) find polysyllables difficult; however, routine sampling and measurement of speech accuracy are insufficient to describe polysyllable accuracy and maturity. This study had two aims: (1) compare two speech production tasks and (2) describe polysyllable errors within the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity. Method: Ninety-three preschool children with SSD from the Sound Start Study (4;0–5;5 years) completed the Polysyllable Preschool Test (POP) and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP-Phonology). Result: Vowel accuracy was significantly different between the POP and the DEAP-Phonology. Polysyllables were analysed using the seven Word-level Analysis of Polysyllables (WAP) error categories: (1) substitution of consonants or vowels (97.8% of children demonstrated common use), (2) deletion of syllables, consonants or vowels (65.6%), (3) distortion of consonants or vowels (0.0%), (4) addition of consonants or vowels (0.0%), (5) alteration of phonotactics (77.4%), (6) alteration of timing (63.4%) and (7) assimilation or alteration of sequence (0.0%). The Framework of Polysyllable Maturity described five levels of maturity based on children’s errors. Conclusions: Polysyllable productions of preschool children with SSD can be analysed and categorised using the WAP and interpreted using the Framework of Polysyllable Maturity.
|
|
Keyword:
phonetics; preschool children; speech; speech disorders; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1168483 https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:55365
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
28 |
Identifying phonological awareness difficulties in preschool children with speech sound disorders
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
How do children with phonological impairment respond to requests for clarification containing polysyllables?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|