| 1 |
The Bird Is the Word
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 8, Iss 0, Pp 097-107 (2014) (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
As Realizações Fonéticas de /R/ em português europeu: análise de um corpus dialetal e implicações no sistema fonológico
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Language and Complexity Considerations: A Biolinguistic Perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Bridget D. SAMUELS. Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. 252 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-969436-5
|
|
|
|
In: Linguística : Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, Vol 7, Pp 209-216 (2012) (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Etimologia não é morfologia: produtividade e composicionalidade na formação e processamento dos "compostos morfológicos" do português
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
City University of New York PHONOTACTIC CONSTRAINTS AND WORD
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cunyphonologyforum.net/WORDHANDOUTS/VelosoMartinsPoster.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
In many languages, some phonological segments or structures are allowed at word boundaries only. The importance of this fact is manifold: it shows that phonology is not “blind ” to the word as a linguistic unit; it can explain some aspects of speech processing (how speech continua are split into words); it may help to build software aimed at identifying word boundaries within larger continua. For European Portuguese and for other Romance languages possibly, it is proposed that a “Prosodic Tolerance of the Word Right Boundary ” should play an important role as a phonotactic cue for word-endings: these languages are known to be very restrictive as far as the segmental codafilling is concerned. However, these restrictions are somehow cancelled at word-endings, which admit phonotactic combinations that are not allowed elsewhere. A formalization of this phenomenon, inspired by the logical formalisms of Declarative Phonology, is also proposed here. Some Basic Assumptions 1 – “Words ” are not universal linguistic units; in some languages, they can be conveniently and completely replaced, for the sake of linguistic description, by units such as the “morphemes”. 2 – However, in languages that admit WFRs (inflectional languages, mainly), words do seem to behave as linguistic units/structures. 3 – Words as linguistic units are ruled by morphological, syntactical, phonological and semantic properties which interact language-specifically. 4–Phonotactic constraints act in many languages as word-boundary cues (Jones 1931; Anderson 1965.); this may be properly described by means of logic-based formalisms, as it is proposed by frameworks like
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.295.5000
http://www.cunyphonologyforum.net/WORDHANDOUTS/VelosoMartinsPoster.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 10 |
PHONOTACTIC CONSTRAINTS AND WORD DEMARCATION IN ROMANCE 1
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cunyphonologyforum.net/WORDABSTRACTS/word-namedabstracts/veloso-martins.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The Bird Is the Word
|
|
|
|
In: http://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/viewFile/339/331/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
