DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Referring expressions and cognitive load ...
Vogels, Jorrig; Howcroft, David; Tourtouri, Elli. - : Open Science Framework, 2020
BASE
Show details
2
How speakers adapt object descriptions to listeners under load
BASE
Show details
3
Where to place inaccessible subjects in Dutch: the role of definiteness and animacy
In: Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. - Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter 13 (2017) 2, 369-398
BLLDB
Show details
4
G-TUNA: a corpus of referring expressions in German, including duration information
Howcroft, David; Demberg, Vera; Vogels, Jorrig. - : Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2017
BASE
Show details
5
Choosing referring expressions in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch: Effects of animacy
In: Lingua <Amsterdam>. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 145 (2014), 104-121
OLC Linguistik
Show details
6
Referential choices in language production : the role of accessibility
Vogels, Jorrig. - [s.l.] : [S.n.], 2014
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
7
Who is where referred to how, and why? The influence of visual saliency on referent accessibility in spoken language production
In: Language and cognitive processes. - Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 28 (2013) 9, 1323-1349
OLC Linguistik
Show details
8
When a Stone Tries to Climb up a Slope: The Interplay between Lexical and Perceptual Animacy in Referential Choices
Vogels, Jorrig; Krahmer, Emiel; Maes, Alfons. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2013
Abstract: Several studies suggest that referential choices are influenced by animacy. On the one hand, animate referents are more likely to be mentioned as subjects than inanimate referents. On the other hand, animate referents are more frequently pronominalized than inanimate referents. These effects have been analyzed as effects of conceptual accessibility. In this paper, we raise the question whether these effects are driven only by lexical concepts, such that referents described by animate lexical items (e.g., “toddler”) are more accessible than referents described by inanimate lexical items (e.g., “shoe”), or can also be influenced by context-derived conceptualizations, such that referents that are perceived as animate in a particular context are more accessible than referents that are not. In two animation-retelling experiments, conducted in Dutch, we investigated the influence of lexical and perceptual animacy on the choice of referent and the choice of referring expression. If the effects of animacy are context-dependent, entities that are perceived as animate should yield more subject references and more pronouns than entities that are perceived as inanimate, irrespective of their lexical animacy. If the effects are tied to lexical concepts, entities described with animate lexical items should be mentioned as the subject and pronominalized more frequently than entities described with inanimate lexical items, irrespective of their perceptual animacy. The results show that while only lexical animacy appears to affect the choice of subject referent, perceptual animacy may overrule lexical animacy in the choice of referring expression. These findings suggest that referential choices can be influenced by conceptualizations based on the perceptual context.
Keyword: Psychology
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00154
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554600
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612700
BASE
Hide details
9
Leve "hun"! Waarom hun nog steeds "hun" zeggen
In: Nederlandse taalkunde. - Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press 16 (2011) 1, 2-29
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
10
The placement of bare plural subjects in Dutch
In: Linguistics in the Netherlands. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Benjamins (2008), 169-180
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
11
The placement of bare plural subjects in Dutch
In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2008 (Amsterdam, 2008), p. 169-180
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
4
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern