1 |
‘Hello! *What your name?’ Children’s evaluations of ungrammatical speakers after live interaction
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Broken Telephone: Children's Judgments of Messages Delivered by Non-Native Speakers are Influenced by Processing Fluency
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
What makes a tumour worse: Taboo context affects how emotional distractors influence picture naming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
What makes a tumour worse: Taboo context affects how emotional distractors influence picture naming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Broken Telephone: Children's Judgments of Messages Delivered by Non-Native Speakers are Influenced by Processing Fluency ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Broken Telephone: Children's Judgments of Messages Delivered by Non-Native Speakers are Influenced by Processing Fluency ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
‘Hello! *What your name?’ Children’s evaluations of ungrammatical speakers after live interaction ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Agreement among parent ratings of children's pragmatic language and social skills
|
|
|
|
In: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1461800536 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Young word learners fail to discriminate phonetic contrasts in certain situations, an observation that has been used to support arguments that the nature of lexical representation and lexical processing changes over development. An alternative possibility, however, is that these failures arise naturally as a result of how word familiarity affects lexical processing. In the present work, we explored the effects of word familiarity on adults’ use of phonetic detail. Participants’ eye movements were monitored as they heard single-segment onset mispronunciations of words drawn from a newly learned artificial lexicon. In Experiment 1, single-feature onset mispronunciations were presented; in Experiment 2, participants heard two-feature onset mispronunciations. Word familiarity was manipulated in both experiments by presenting words with various frequencies during training. Both word familiarity and degree of mismatch affected adults’ use of phonetic detail: in their looking behavior, participants did not reliably differentiate single-feature mispronunciations and correct pronunciations of low frequency words. For higher frequency words, participants differentiated both 1- and 2-feature mispronunciations from correct pronunciations. However, responses were graded such that 2-feature mispronunciations had a greater effect on looking behavior. These experiments demonstrate that the use of phonetic detail in adults, as in young children, is affected by word familiarity. Parallels between the two populations suggest continuity in the architecture underlying lexical representation and processing throughout development.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779480
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
SMART-T: A system for novel fully automated anticipatory eye-tracking paradigms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|