41 |
Some universals of reflexive construction markers and a possible efficiency-based explanation (conference talk, LSA annual meeting New Orleans) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
42 |
Some universals of reflexive construction markers and a possible efficiency-based explanation (conference talk, LSA annual meeting New Orleans) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
43 |
Testable universals, the natural-kinds programme, and presupposed universals in grammatical theorizing (conference handout) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
44 |
The polycategoriality parameter: Noun-verb similarities in some languages of the Americas (conference talk, SSILA New Orleans) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
45 |
The polycategoriality parameter: Noun-verb similarities in some languages of the Americas (conference talk, SSILA New Orleans) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
46 |
Testable universals, the natural-kinds programme, and presupposed universals in grammatical theorizing (conference handout) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
47 |
The morph as a minimal linguistic form
|
|
|
|
In: Morphology (Dordr) (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
This paper makes a terminological proposal: that the old term morph can be used for a minimal linguistic form. Many linguists (not only morphologists) need such a term, because we often refer to minimal linguistic forms, but the various terms used by linguists in roughly this meaning are either unclear or do not refer to forms. The term “morpheme” has three rather different meanings, and other terms such as “vocabulary item” are too abstract. The term “morph” can be used as the basis for defining other widely used terms such as “root”, “prefix”, and “suffix”, which are currently often defined as kinds of “morphemes”. It can also serve as the basis for a clearer definition of suppletion (involving suppletive morph sets) and morph variants, thus avoiding the confusions surrounding the term “allomorph(y)”.
|
|
Keyword:
Discussion Note
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327577/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09355-5
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
50 |
What is easier to understand, mechanisms or results of linguistic changes? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
51 |
What is easier to understand, mechanisms or results of linguistic changes? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
52 |
Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
53 |
Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
57 |
Early encounters: Egyptian-Coptic studies and comparative linguistics in the century from Schlegel to Finck ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
60 |
Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|