1 |
Las Políticas del Lenguaje y los Debates Nacionalistas: El Caso de los Estados Unidos y México (2000).
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Communication Styles and Attention Performance in Primary School Children
|
|
|
|
In: Behavioral Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 12; Pages: 172 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Needs Analysis of Psychosocial Module Development Based on Psychoeducation Approach for Public University Students in Malaysia
|
|
|
|
In: Education Sciences ; Volume 11 ; Issue 10 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
ASSERTIVENESS AROUND THE 2019’s PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDACY DISCOURSE ON SOCIAL MEDIA: A SOCIOPRAGMATIC STUDY
|
|
|
|
In: LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra; Vol 16, No 1 (2021): LiNGUA; 139 - 150 ; 2442-3823 ; 1693-4725 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The effects of enactment on communicative competence in aphasic casual conversation: a functional linguistic perspective
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
El desarrollo de las habilidades sociales en las bibliotecas escolares como mejora de las prácticas orales del alumnado a través de la lectura.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Обучение навыкам ассертивности на уроках иностранного языка в сфере делового и профессионального общения ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Las Políticas del Lenguaje y los Debates Nacionalistas: El Caso de los Estados Unidos y México (2000).
|
|
|
|
In: Delgado-P., Guillermo,. Klahn, Norma,,; Castillo, Pedro,; & Alvarez, Alejandro, eds. (2016). Las Políticas del Lenguaje y los Debates Nacionalistas: El Caso de los Estados Unidos y México (2000). In Las Nuevas Fronteras del Siglo XXI/New Frontiers of the 21st Century ISBN968-6719-57-1. UC Santa Cruz: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5810s3gx (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
A Cognitive Perspective for Understanding and Training Assertiveness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Discours managérial, lissage de la parole et vacillement du rapport au langage : l’empêchement de l’expression subjective des émotions
|
|
|
|
In: Langage et société, N 158, 4, 2016-10-27, pp.35-50 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
СЕМАНТИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛЕ СЛОВА «РАДОСТЬ» В КНИГЕ К. АНТАРОВОЙ «ДВЕ ЖИЗНИ»
|
|
СЕРДОБИНЦЕВА ЕЛЕНА НИКОЛАЕВНА. - : Государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Пензенский государственный университет», 2015
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Student interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in American Studies, clip 5 of 17
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Speaking in an alien voice: A womanist comparison of the use of language by Scottish and West African female playwrights.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Assertive Communication Program for Chinese Australians - Final Report ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Assertive Communication Program for Chinese Australians - Final Report
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Self-promotion vs. backlash prevention: regulatory focus and gender differences in self-advocacy
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Considerable evidence has shown that, relative to men, women are less effective at self-advocacy, despite its importance for closing the gender gap in professional success. Women fear backlash for counterstereotypical behavior (such as self-promotion, which violates prescriptions for female communality), and engage in defensive strategies designed to avoid it (Rudman & Fairchild, 2004). No research has tested the effects of fear of backlash on performance (e.g., self-advocacy). To address this gap, I propose that backlash threat leads to an inhibitory prevention focused self-regulatory style (Crowe & Higgins, 1997) that subsequently interferes with women's self-advocacy ability. In contrast, because self-advocacy behavior does not violate masculine prescriptive stereotypes, I expect that men will not experience fear of backlash; as a result, they will employ a successful promotion focused regulatory style, and demonstrate greater self-advocacy ability. Experiment 1 validated the usage of a lexical decision task to implicitly assess acute regulatory focus. Experiment 2 tested my focal hypotheses by comparing male and female participants on a self or peer-advocacy task. Results did not support the hypothesized gender differences or the predictive utility of the proposed model. However, for self-advocating women, the model performed as expected, such that threat of backlash lead to lowered ability to employ a useful promotion focused regulatory style, resulting in diminished advocacy ability. Implications for future research and women's self-advocacy abilities, as well as limitations of the research, are discussed. ; M.S. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 60-68).
|
|
Keyword:
Assertiveness (Psychology); Psychology; Sex difference (Psychology); Work--Psychological aspects
|
|
URL: http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001600001.ETD.17357
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
International Conference on Engineering Education August 6 -- 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2001/Proceedings/authors/./papers/311.pdf (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Influence of language power on self-perception
|
|
|
|
In: Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers (1994)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|