DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 71

1
How Well Do LSTM Language Models Learn Filler-gap Dependencies?
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Using Interlinear Glosses as Pivot in Low-Resource Multilingual Machine Translation ...
BASE
Show details
3
A Resource for Computational Experiments on Mapudungun ...
BASE
Show details
4
Language Technologies for Humanitarian Aid ...
BASE
Show details
5
Language Technologies for Humanitarian Aid ...
BASE
Show details
6
Adapting Word Embeddings to New Languages with Morphological and Phonological Subword Representations ...
BASE
Show details
7
ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology ...
BASE
Show details
8
ParaMor: Minimally-Supervised Induction of Paradigm Structure and Morphological Analysis ...
BASE
Show details
9
ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology ...
BASE
Show details
10
POS error detection in automatically annotated corpora
Rehbein, Ines [Verfasser]; Levin, Lori [Herausgeber]; Stede, Manfred [Herausgeber]. - Mannheim : Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Bibliothek, 2016
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
11
Polyglot Neural Language Models: A Case Study in Cross-Lingual Phonetic Representation Learning ...
BASE
Show details
12
Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks (GEAF) 2015 Workshop
Bender, Emily,; Levin, Lori; Müller, Stefan. - : HAL CCSD, 2015. : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015
In: The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01181344 ; The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Jul 2015, Beijing, China. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015 (2015)
BASE
Show details
13
Statistical modality tagging from rule-based annotations and crowdsourcing ...
BASE
Show details
14
Use of Modality and Negation in Semantically-Informed Syntactic MT ...
BASE
Show details
15
STTS 2.0? Improving the tagset for the part-of-speech-tagging of German spoken data
Westpfahl, Swantje [Verfasser]; Levin, Lori [Herausgeber]; Stede, Manfred [Herausgeber]. - Mannheim : Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Bibliothek, 2014
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
16
A Modality Lexicon and its use in Automatic Tagging ...
BASE
Show details
17
Semantically-Informed Syntactic Machine Translation: A Tree-Grafting Approach ...
BASE
Show details
18
Use of Modality and Negation in Semantically-Informed Syntactic MT
In: DTIC (2012)
BASE
Show details
19
Statistical Modality Tagging from Rule-based Annotations and Crowdsourcing
Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar; Bloodgood, Michael; Diab, Mona. - : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012
BASE
Show details
20
Use of Modality and Negation in Semantically-Informed Syntactic MT
Abstract: This article describes the resource- and system-building efforts of an 8-week Johns Hopkins University Human Language Technology Center of Excellence Summer Camp for Applied Language Exploration (SCALE-2009) on Semantically Informed Machine Translation (SIMT). We describe a new modality/negation (MN) annotation scheme, the creation of a (publicly available) MN lexicon, and two automated MN taggers that we built using the annotation scheme and lexicon. Our annotation scheme isolates three components of modality and negation: a trigger (a word that conveys modality or negation), a target (an action associated with modality or negation), and a holder (an experiencer of modality). We describe how our MN lexicon was semi-automatically produced and we demonstrate that a structure-based MN tagger results in precision around 86% (depending on genre) for tagging of a standard LDC data set. We apply our MN annotation scheme to statistical machine translation using a syntactic framework that supports the inclusion of semantic annotations. Syntactic tags enriched with semantic annotations are assigned to parse trees in the target-language training texts through a process of tree grafting. Although the focus of our work is modality and negation, the tree grafting procedure is general and supports other types of semantic information. We exploit this capability by including named entities, produced by a pre-existing tagger, in addition to the MN elements produced by the taggers described here. The resulting system significantly outperformed a linguistically naive baseline model (Hiero), and reached the highest scores yet reported on the NIST 2009 Urdu–English test set. This finding supports the hypothesis that both syntactic and semantic information can improve translation quality. ; This work was supported, in part, by the Johns Hopkins Human Language Technology Center of Excellence (HLTCOE), by the National Science Foundation under grant IIS-0713448, and by BBN Technologies under GALE DARPA/IPTO contract no. HR0011-06-C-0022. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.
Keyword: artificial intelligence; computational linguistics; computer science; human language technology; machine translation; modality; natural language processing; negation; semantically-informed machine translation; statistical machine translation; statistical methods; translation technology
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/15547
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
6
2
4
0
3
0
0
Bibliographies
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
48
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern