Home
Catalogue search
Refine your search:
Keyword
Creator / Publisher:
Miller, Paul Chamness (3)
Beckett, Gulbahar H (1)
Coward, Fanni Liu (1)
Garfinkel, Alan (1)
Sauro, Shannon (1)
Year
Medium:
Online (2)
Print (1)
Type:
Article (3)
BLLDB-Access
Search in the Catalogues and Directories
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
Sort by
creator [A → Z]
'
creator [Z → A]
'
publishing year ↑ (asc)
'
publishing year ↓ (desc)
'
title [A → Z]
'
title [Z → A]
'
Simple Search
Hits 1 – 3 of 3
1
Navigating the Graduate Seminar Discussion: A Qualitative Analysis of International Students’ Experiences
Coward, Fanni Liu
;
Miller, Paul Chamness
In: International Journal of Communication; Vol 4 (2010); 19 ; 1932-8036 (2010)
BASE
Show details
2
Book Reviews
Sauro, Shannon
;
Beckett, Gulbahar H
;
Miller, Paul Chamness
In:
Studies in second language acquisition. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press
30 (2008) 3, 412
OLC Linguistik
Show details
3
The effectiveness of corrective feedback: A meta-analysis
Miller, Paul Chamness
In: Theses and Dissertations Available from ProQuest (2003)
Abstract:
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether oral corrective feedback is effective in the noticing of language learners' errors. Over the last several decades there has been a stronger desire to see a more communicative approach to language learning, yet without giving up the focus on form (Long, 1991). In this communicative approach, however, there is an indication that positive evidence alone is not enough to adequately learn a language. Research suggests that negative evidence, as well as opportunities to repair language as a result of negative evidence, is essential for second language acquisition. One form of negative evidence is oral corrective feedback. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that oral corrective feedback is effective in leading language learners to notice the gap in their interlanguage. There are indications that explicit feedback might be among the most effective forms of feedback, but further research is needed in order to make stronger assertions as to which types are more effective. The results also indicate that feedback might be more effective among certain types of target languages, among certain native languages and among certain age groups, but further research on these specific variables is needed before stronger claims may be made.
Keyword:
Language arts
URL:
https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3108383
BASE
Hide details
Mobile view
All
Catalogues
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
0
IDS Mannheim
0
OLC Linguistik
1
UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog
0
DNB Subject Category Language
0
Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft
0
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS)
0
Bibliographies
BLLDB
0
BDSL
0
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
0
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
0
IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen
0
IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen
0
IDS OBELEX meta
0
MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection
0
MPI for Psycholinguistics
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
Annohub
0
Online resources
Link directory
0
Journal directory
0
Database directory
0
Dictionary directory
0
Open access documents
BASE
2
Linguistik-Repository
0
IDS Publikationsserver
0
Online dissertations
0
Language Description Heritage
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik
|
Imprint
|
Privacy Policy
|
Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern