DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 8 of 8

1
Serial span predicts vocoded sentence recognition (Bosen & Barry, 2020) ...
Bosen, Adam K.; Barry, Michael F.. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Serial span predicts vocoded sentence recognition (Bosen & Barry, 2020) ...
Bosen, Adam K.; Barry, Michael F.. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Serial span predicts vocoded sentence recognition (Bosen & Barry, 2020) ...
Bosen, Adam K.; Barry, Michael F.. - : ASHA journals, 2020
BASE
Show details
5
Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2020)
BASE
Show details
6
Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words
In: Audit Percept Cogn (2020)
BASE
Show details
7
Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall
In: Ear Hear (2019)
BASE
Show details
8
Individualized Frequency Importance Functions for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss
In: Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education Faculty Publications (2019)
Abstract: The Speech Intelligibility Index includes a series of frequency importance functions for calculating the estimated intelligibility of speech under various conditions. Until recently, techniques to derive frequency importance required averaging data over a group of listeners, thus hindering the ability to observe individual differences due to factors such as hearing loss. In the current study, the “random combination strategy” [Bosen and Chatterjee (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 3718–3727] was used to derive frequency importance functions for individual hearing-impaired listeners, and normal-hearing participants for comparison. Functions were measured by filtering sentences to contain only random subsets of frequency bands on each trial, and regressing speech recognition against the presence or absence of bands across trials. Results show that the contribution of each band to speech recognition was inversely proportional to audiometric threshold in that frequency region, likely due to reduced audibility, even though stimuli were shaped to compensate for each individual's hearing loss. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that this method is sensitive to factors that alter the shape of frequency importance functions within individuals with hearing loss, which could be used to characterize the impact of audibility or other factors related to suprathreshold deficits or hearing aid processing strategies.
Keyword: Audiometers; Audiometry; Auditory Perception; Auditory System; Communication Sciences and Disorders; Hearing Aids; Hearing Impairment; Regression Analysis; Speech Communication; Speech Pathology and Audiology; Speech Perception; Speech Recognition
URL: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1506&context=comd_facpub
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/comd_facpub/507
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
8
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern