DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 12 of 12

1
Represented Speech in Dementia Discourse
Maclagan M; Davis B. - 2018
BASE
Show details
2
PHILISTINE NAMES AND TERMS ONCE AGAIN A Recent Perspective
Maeir, AM; Davis, B; Hitchcock, LA. - : PENN STATE UNIV PRESS, 2016
BASE
Show details
3
Losing to Terrorism: An American Work in Progress
In: Metaphilosophy. - Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell 35 (2004) 3, 345-364
OLC Linguistik
Show details
4
Production Constraints on Utterance-Final Consonant Characteristics in Babbling
In: Phonetica. - Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton 54 (1997) 3-4, 172-186
OLC Linguistik
Show details
5
Speech transforms
In: Speech communication. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 11 (1992) 4-5, 357-368
BLLDB
Show details
6
Phonetics of baby tal speech : implications for infant speech perception
In: Perilus XIV (Stockholm, 1991), P. 157-158
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
7
Acquisition of speech production : frames, then content
In: Motor representation and control (Hillsdale,NJ [etc.], 1990), P.453-476
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
8
A mathematical model of retrieval system performance
In: American Society for Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. - New York, NY : Wiley 41 (1990) 7, 495-500
BLLDB
Show details
9
Apraxia of speech in children : characteristics, etiology, assessment, treatment, case study, conclusion
In: Speech evaluation (New York [etc.]), P.113-132
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
10
Some aspects of ' nature ' in cosmetic advertisements
In: Papers in language variation (Alabama, 1977), P.289-294
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
11
Explaining Sonority Projection Effects
In: http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/1142-0511/1142-DALAND-0-0.PDF
Abstract: Sonority projection refers to behavioral distinctions speakers make between unattested phonological sequences on the basis of sonority. For example, among onset clusters, the well‐formedness relation [bn] > [lb] is observed in speech perception, speech production, and nonword acceptability (Albright, in preparation; Berent, Steriade, Lenertz, & Vaknin, 2007; Davidson 2006, 2007). We begin by replicating the sonority projection effects in a nonword acceptability study. Then we evaluate the extent to which sonority projection is predicted by existing computational models of phonotactics (Coleman & Pierrehumbert 1997; Hayes & Wilson 2008; et alia). We show that a model based only on lexical statistics can explain sonority projection in English without a pre‐existing sonority sequencing principle. To do this, a model must possess (i) a featural system supporting sonority‐based generalizations and (ii) a context representation including syllabification or equivalent information. 1
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.387.3189
http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/1142-0511/1142-DALAND-0-0.PDF
BASE
Hide details
12
Society for Information Sciences, 21: 187-194.
In: http://crl.nmsu.edu/Research/Projects/tipster/ursa/Papers/PDF/trec_paper.pdf
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
4
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern