DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 24

1
The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
In: Ear Hear (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge ...
BASE
Show details
3
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge ...
BASE
Show details
4
Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task
In: Ear Hear (2018)
BASE
Show details
5
The Pupil Dilation Response During Speech Perception in Dark and Light: The Involvement of the Parasympathetic Nervous System in Listening Effort
Wang, Yang; Kramer, Sophia E.; Wendt, Dorothea. - : SAGE Publications, 2018
BASE
Show details
6
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge
BASE
Show details
7
Relations between self-reported daily-life fatigue, hearing status and pupil dilation during a speech perception in noise task
Wang, Yang; Naylor, Graham; Kramer, Sophia E.. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2018
BASE
Show details
8
Relations between self-reported daily-life fatigue, hearing status, and pupil dilation during a speech perception in noise task
Wang, Yang; Naylor, Graham; Kramer, Sophia E.. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of available evidence on the effect of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort. Two research questions were addressed: Q1) does hearing impairment affect listening effort? and Q2) can hearing aid amplification affect listening effort during speech comprehension? DESIGN: English language articles were identified through systematic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO from inception to August 2014. References of eligible studies were checked. The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study design strategy was used to create inclusion criteria for relevance. It was not feasible to apply a meta-analysis of the results from comparable studies. For the articles identified as relevant, a quality rating, based on the 2011 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group guidelines, was carried out to judge the reliability and confidence of the estimated effects. RESULTS: The primary search produced 7017 unique hits using the keywords: hearing aids OR hearing impairment AND listening effort OR perceptual effort OR ease of listening. Of these, 41 articles fulfilled the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study design selection criteria of: experimental work on hearing impairment OR hearing aid technologies AND listening effort OR fatigue during speech perception. The methods applied in those articles were categorized into subjective, behavioral, and physiological assessment of listening effort. For each study, the statistical analysis addressing research question Q1 and/or Q2 was extracted. In seven articles more than one measure of listening effort was provided. Evidence relating to Q1 was provided by 21 articles that reported 41 relevant findings. Evidence relating to Q2 was provided by 27 articles that reported 56 relevant findings. The quality of evidence on both research questions (Q1 and Q2) was very low, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group guidelines. We tested the statistical evidence across studies with nonparametric tests. The testing revealed only one consistent effect across studies, namely that listening effort was higher for hearing-impaired listeners compared with normal-hearing listeners (Q1) as measured by electroencephalographic measures. For all other studies, the evidence across studies failed to reveal consistent effects on listening effort. CONCLUSION: In summary, we could only identify scientific evidence from physiological measurement methods, suggesting that hearing impairment increases listening effort during speech perception (Q1). There was no scientific, finding across studies indicating that hearing aid amplification decreases listening effort (Q2). In general, there were large differences in the study population, the control groups and conditions, and the outcome measures applied between the studies included in this review. The results of this review indicate that published listening effort studies lack consistency, lack standardization across studies, and have insufficient statistical power. The findings underline the need for a common conceptual framework for listening effort to address the current shortcomings.
URL: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/138079/
BASE
Hide details
10
Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort - a systematic review
Ohlenforst, Barbara; Zekveld, Adriana; Jansma, Elise. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2017
BASE
Show details
11
Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation
BASE
Show details
12
Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers
Kilman, Lisa; Zekveld, Adriana; Hällgren, Mathias. - : SAGE Publications, 2015
BASE
Show details
13
The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception performance
Kilman, Lisa; Zekveld, Adriana; Hällgren, Mathias. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2014
BASE
Show details
14
The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
In: Brain and Mind Institute Researchers' Publications (2014)
BASE
Show details
15
Processing load during listening: The influence of task characteristics on the pupil response
In: Language and cognitive processes. - Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 28 (2013) 4, 426-442
OLC Linguistik
Show details
16
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances
Rönnberg, Jerker; Lunner, Thomas; Zekveld, Adriana. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2013
BASE
Show details
17
How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise—A Review
Besser, Jana; Koelewijn, Thomas; Zekveld, Adriana A.. - : SAGE Publications, 2013
BASE
Show details
18
Corrigendum to “Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility” [Brain Lang. 122 (2012) 103–113]
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 123 (2012) 2, 143
OLC Linguistik
Show details
19
Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 122 (2012) 2, 103-113
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
20
Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities
Koelewijn, Thomas; Zekveld, Adriana A.; Festen, Joost M.. - : Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2012
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
18
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern