Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...373

Hits 1 – 20 of 7.457

1	Cortical microstructure in primary progressive aphasia: a multicenter study.
	Illán-Gala, Ignacio; Montal, Victor; Borrego-Écija, Sergi...
	In: Alzheimer's research & therapy, vol 14, iss 1 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

2	Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
	Ali, M.; Ben Basat, A. L.; Berthier, M....
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

3	An umbrella review of aphasia intervention description in research: The AsPIRE project
	Dipper, L. T.; Franklin, S.; de Aguiar, V....
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

4	Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
	McCracken, Molly; Rohde, Alexia; Lawson, Nadin; Godecke, Erin; Doi, Suhail A.; Wong, Andrew; Cremer, Rebecca; Worrall, Linda; O'Halloran, Robyn; Farrell, Anna
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	Abstract: Purpose: To describe the development and determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test in detecting aphasia. Methods: Consecutive acute stroke admissions (n = 100; mean = 66.49y) participated in a single (assessor) blinded cross-sectional study. Index assessment was the ∼45 min Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test. The Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test is further divided into four 15–25 min Short Tests: two Foundation Tests (severe impairment), Standard (moderate) and High Level Test (mild). Independent reference standard included the Language Screening Test, Aphasia Screening Test, Comprehensive Aphasia Test and/or Measure for Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities, treating team diagnosis and aphasia referral post-ward discharge. Results: Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test cut-off score of ≤ 157 demonstrated 80.8% (LR+ =10.9) sensitivity and 92.6% (LR− =0.21) specificity. All Short Tests reported specificities of ≥ 92.6%. Foundation Tests I (cut-off ≤ 61) and II (cut-off ≤ 51) reported lower sensitivity (≥ 57.5%) given their focus on severe conditions. The Standard (cut-off ≤ 90) and High Level Test (cut-off ≤ 78) reported sensitivities of ≥ 72.6%. Conclusion: The Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test is a sensitive assessment of aphasia. Diagnostically, the High Level Test recorded the highest psychometric capabilities of the Short Tests, equivalent to the full Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test. The test is available for download from brisbanetest.org. Implications for rehabilitation: Aphasia is a debilitating condition and accurate identification of language disorders is important in healthcare. Language assessment is complex and the accuracy of assessment procedures is dependent upon a variety of factors. The Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test is a new evidence-based language test specifically designed to adapt to varying patient need, clinical contexts and co-occurring conditions. In this cross-sectional validation study, the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test was found to be a sensitive measure for identifying aphasia in stroke.
	Keyword: Aphasia; diagnosis; evidence-based; Medicine and Health Sciences; sensitivity and specificity; stroke; test
	URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/8392 https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9398&context=ecuworkspost2013
	BASE
	Hide details

5	Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
	Williams, Louise R.; Ali, Myzoon; VandenBerg, Kathryn...
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

6	Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
	Rohde, Alexia; McCracken, Molly; Worrall, Linda...
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

7	Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the collaboration of aphasia trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
	Behn, Nicholas; Harrison, Madeleine; Brady, Marian C....
	In: Research outputs 2022 to 2026 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

8	An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
	Ali, Myzoon; Hilari, Katerina; Martinez-Ferreiro, Silvia...
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

9	Investigation of the implementation of a communication enhanced environment model on an acute/slow stream rehabilitation and a rehabilitation ward: A before-and-after pilot study
	D’Souza, Sarah; Godecke, Erin; Ciccone, Natalie...
	In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

10	Neuro-Oncology Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations for Cognitive and Behavioral Testing for Research Purposes
	Jasleen Kaur; Andrew Egladyous; Claudia Valdivia; Andy G. S. Daniel; Saritha Krishna; Alexander A. Aabedi; David Brang; Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper
	In: Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 3; Pages: 692 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

11	A Preliminary Report of Network Electroencephalographic Measures in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
	Rene L. Utianski; Hugo Botha; John N. Caviness; Gregory A. Worrell; Joseph R. Duffy; Heather M. Clark; Jennifer L. Whitwell; Keith A. Josephs
	In: Brain Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 3; Pages: 378 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

12	Effect of Lexical-Semantic Cues during Real-Time Sentence Processing in Aphasia
	Niloofar Akhavan; Christina Sen; Carolyn Baker; Noelle Abbott; Michelle Gravier; Tracy Love
	In: Brain Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 3; Pages: 312 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

13	Primary and Secondary Progressive Aphasia in Posterior Cortical Atrophy
	Catherine Brodeur; Émilie Belley; Lisa-Marie Deschênes; Adriana Enriquez-Rosas; Michelyne Hubert; Anik Guimond; Josée Bilodeau; Jean-Paul Soucy; Joël Macoir
	In: Life; Volume 12; Issue 5; Pages: 662 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

14	Imaging Clinical Subtypes and Associated Brain Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease
	Karl Herholz
	In: Brain Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 2; Pages: 146 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

15	Benefits from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
	Michał Starosta; Natalia Cichoń; Joanna Saluk-Bijak; Elżbieta Miller
	In: Journal of Clinical Medicine; Volume 11; Issue 8; Pages: 2149 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

16	Syntactic deficits in language comprehension in individuals with schizophrenia and Broca's aphasia ...
	Rajith, K Ravindren; P Ashokkumar. - : Zenodo, 2022
	BASE
	Show details

17	Syntactic deficits in language comprehension in individuals with schizophrenia and Broca's aphasia ...
	Rajith, K Ravindren; P Ashokkumar. - : Zenodo, 2022
	BASE
	Show details

18	The contribution of white matter pathology, hypoperfusion, lesion load, and stroke recurrence to language deficits following acute subcortical left hemisphere stroke ...
	Sharif, Massoud. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
	BASE
	Show details

19	A 'Mini Linguistic State Examination' to classify primary progressive aphasia. ...
	Patel, Nikil; Peterson, Katie A; Ingram, Ruth U. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2022
	BASE
	Show details

20	A 'Mini Linguistic State Examination' to classify primary progressive aphasia. ...
	Patel, Nikil; Peterson, Katie A; Ingram, Ruth U. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2022
	BASE
	Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...373

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern