DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6...287
Hits 21 – 40 of 5.732

21
Contrastive interventions (Storkel, 2022) ...
Storkel, Holly L.. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
22
Contrastive interventions (Storkel, 2022) ...
Storkel, Holly L.. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
23
Voice rest after microflap for benign lesions (King et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
24
Transmasculine voice after laryngeal manipulation (Dahl et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
25
Mechanisms in primary muscle tension dysphonia (Desjardins et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
26
Mechanisms in primary muscle tension dysphonia (Desjardins et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
27
Optimizing intervention outcomes and experiences (Baker et al., 2022) ...
Baker, Elise; Masso, Sarah; Huynh, Kylie. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
28
Optimizing intervention outcomes and experiences (Baker et al., 2022) ...
Baker, Elise; Masso, Sarah; Huynh, Kylie. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
29
How do clinicians judge fluency in aphasia? (Gordon & Clough, 2022) ...
Gordon, Jean K.; Clough, Sharice. - : ASHA journals, 2022
Abstract: Purpose: Aphasia fluency is multiply determined by underlying impairments in lexical retrieval, grammatical formulation, and speech production. This poses challenges for establishing a reliable and feasible tool to measure fluency in the clinic. We examine the reliability and validity of perceptual ratings and clinical perspectives on the utility and relevance of methods used to assess fluency. Method: In an online survey, 112 speech-language pathologists rated spontaneous speech samples from 181 people with aphasia (PwA) on eight perceptual rating scales (overall fluency, speech rate, pausing, effort, melody, phrase length, grammaticality, and lexical retrieval) and answered questions about their current practices for assessing fluency in the clinic. Results: Interrater reliability for the eight perceptual rating scales ranged from fair to good. The most reliable scales were speech rate, pausing, and phrase length. Similarly, clinicians’ perceived fluency ratings were most strongly correlated to objective ...
Keyword: Neurology and neuromuscular diseases; Speech pathology
URL: https://asha.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/How_do_clinicians_judge_fluency_in_aphasia_Gordon_Clough_2022_/19326419/1
https://dx.doi.org/10.23641/asha.19326419.v1
BASE
Hide details
30
How do clinicians judge fluency in aphasia? (Gordon & Clough, 2022) ...
Gordon, Jean K.; Clough, Sharice. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
31
The 'real-life' benefit of hearing preservation cochlear implantation in the paediatric population ...
Schaefer, Simone. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
32
Participants’ Satisfaction with Functional Treatment Goals
In: Honors College Theses (2022)
BASE
Show details
33
Scripted-sentence learning in Spanish speakers (Quique et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
34
Sentence production in latent aphasia (Salis & DeDe, 2022) ...
Salis, Christos; DeDe, Gayle. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
35
Scripted-sentence learning in Spanish speakers (Quique et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
36
Benefits of time for self-repair in aphasia (Leaman & Archer, 2022) ...
Leaman, Marion C.; Archer, Brent. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
37
Sentence production in latent aphasia (Salis & DeDe, 2022) ...
Salis, Christos; DeDe, Gayle. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details
38
Assessing agrammatic aphasia (Dyson et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
39
Assessing agrammatic aphasia (Dyson et al., 2022) ...
BASE
Show details
40
Benefits of time for self-repair in aphasia (Leaman & Archer, 2022) ...
Leaman, Marion C.; Archer, Brent. - : ASHA journals, 2022
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6...287

Catalogues
341
0
230
0
0
4
15
Bibliographies
3.939
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
41
18
1
0
Open access documents
1.735
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern