1 |
Learning from communication versus observation in great apes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Inferential communication : bridging the gap between intentional and ostensive communication in non-human primates
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Learning from communication versus observation in great apes
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Perspectives on dog–human interactions ; Perspektiven von Mensch-Hund-Interaktionen
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Inferring unseen causes : developmental and evolutionary origins
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Inferring Unseen Causes: Developmental and Evolutionary Origins
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Natural reference : a phylo- and ontogenetic perspective on the comprehension of iconic gestures and vocalizations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Language Origins Viewed in Spontaneous and Interactive Vocal Rates of Human and Bonobo Infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Supplementary material from "Imitation of novel conspecific and human speech sounds in the killer whale ( Orcinus orca )" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Supplementary material from "Imitation of novel conspecific and human speech sounds in the killer whale ( Orcinus orca )" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Imitation of novel conspecific and human speech sounds in the killer whale (Orcinus orca)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Imitation of novel conspecific and human speech sounds in the killer whale (Orcinus orca)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Great apes and children infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Sensitivity to relational similarity and object similarity in apes and children
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This research was supported by NSF SLC Grant SBE-0541957 awarded to the Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SILC), the Max Planck Society, and Swarthmore Lang Sabbatical Fellowship. ; Relational reasoning is a hallmark of sophisticated cognition in humans [1, 2]. Does it exist in other primates? Despite some affirmative answers [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11], there appears to be a wide gap in relational ability between humans and other primates—even other apes [1, 2]. Here, we test one possible explanation for this gap, motivated by developmental research showing that young humans often fail at relational reasoning tasks because they focus on objects instead of relations [12, 13, 14]. When asked, “duck:duckling is like tiger:?,” preschool children choose another duckling (object match) rather than a cub. If other apes share this focus on concrete objects, it could undermine their relational reasoning in similar ways. To test this, we compared great apes and 3-year-old humans’ relational reasoning on the same spatial mapping task, with and without competing object matches. Without competing object matches, both children and Pan species (chimpanzees and bonobos) spontaneously used relational similarity, albeit children more so. But when object matches were present, only children responded strongly to them. We conclude that the relational gap is not due to great apes’ preference for concrete objects. In fact, young humans show greater object focus than nonhuman apes. ; Postprint ; Peer reviewed
|
|
Keyword:
BDC; BF; BF Psychology; NDAS; QL; QL Zoology; R2C; RC0321; RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.054 http://hdl.handle.net/10023/10229 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982215015857?via%3Dihub#app2
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Are apes essentialists? Scope and limits of psychological essentialism in great apes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Cognitive differences between orang-utan species: a test of the cultural intelligence hypothesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|