| 2 |
La controvertida datación del Vocabulario español-latino de Nebrija. A propósito del término "canoa" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
La controvertida datación del Vocabulario español-latino de Nebrija. A propósito del término "canoa" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
La controvertida datación del Vocabulario español-latino de Nebrija. A propósito del término "canoa"
|
|
|
|
In: Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Historiografía Lingüística, ISSN 1695-2030, Nº. 13, 2019, pags. 123-127 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
La sintaxis del verbo en la gramática latina. De la Antigüedad al Renacimiento
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Reseñas de Libros ; Book Reviews
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Estudios Latinos; Vol 7 (2007); 261-293 ; Revista de Estudios Latinos; Vol. 7 (2007); 261-293 ; 2255-5056 ; 1578-7486 (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Emmanvelis Alvari e Societate Iesv "De Institvtione grammatica liber secundvs, de octo partium Orationis construction" : estudio, edición crítica, notas e índices
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
El quod latino y el que español introductores de condicionales
|
|
|
|
In: Revista española de lingüística, ISSN 0210-1874, Año nº 32, Fasc. 2 (JUL-DIC), 2002, pags. 413-440 (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Syntactic cases and lexical cases ; Casos sintácticos y casos léxicos
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Estudios Latinos; Vol 1 (2001); 55-75 ; Revista de Estudios Latinos; Vol. 1 (2001); 55-75 ; 2255-5056 ; 1578-7486 (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
El superlativo relativo, ¿comparativo o superlativo?. Una vieja polémica gramatical
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Since Greek authors is has been traditionally agreed that comparison is a three degree-system: positive, comparative and superlative. Doctrine also argues that superlative can compare, specially in case of relative superlative, which compares a term with another of the same category. According to this doctrine, relative superlative is, therefore, a comparative rather than an elative. Against this traditional idea, the most rational grammatic since Prisciano to Brocense argues that superlative, even the relative one, is superlative and not comparative and that the genitive that sometimes depends on it is not a second term of comparison, but a partitive. This idea is based on two arguments: first, the functions which doctrine ascribes to relative superlative -for example, to connect a term with another of the same category- can also be worded by a comparatife and, hence, superlative is not needed for this function and the compolement which depends on a comparative is not a second term of comparison but a partitive, so that the complement which depends on a relative superlative must be aso partitive and not comparative. Second, it is necessary to prove with some texts that tripartite system of comparison, in fact does not exist: that is to say that texts and facts demonstrate that comparative is comparative and superlative, even relative superlative, is superlative. We believe that true is, as always, in aurea mediocritas.
|
|
Keyword:
Brocense; Clasificadores; Classificadors; Comparatiu; Comparativo; Cuantificador; Fugier; Genitiu depenent; Genitivo dependiente; Grados del adjetivo; Graus de l'adjetivo; Partitiu; Partitivo; Positiu; Positivo; Prisciano; Quantificador; Substitució sintàctica; Superlatiu; Superlativo; Sustitución sintáctica
|
|
URL: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/20233
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Rasgos semánticos de las oraciones finales
|
|
|
|
In: Revista española de lingüística, ISSN 0210-1874, Año nº 21, Fasc. 2, 1991, pags. 205-216 (1991)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Antroponimia cacereña en la epigrafía latina: la geminación
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
