1 |
Many systems, one strategy: Acquiring ordinals in Dutch and English
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 100 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Deriving Functional Projections
|
|
|
|
In: North East Linguistics Society (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Acquisition as a window on the nature of NPIs
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 462-479 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 462-479 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Ordinals are not as easy as one, two, three: The acquisition of cardinals and ordinals in Dutch ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Ordinals are not as easy as one, two, three: The acquisition of cardinals and ordinals in Dutch ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The effects of phonological skills and vocabulary on morphophonological processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0267-6583 ; EISSN: 1477-0326 ; Second Language Research ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570747 ; Second Language Research, SAGE Publications, 2008, 24 (3), pp.333-364. ⟨10.1177/0267658308090184⟩ (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0267-6583 ; EISSN: 1477-0326 ; Second Language Research ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570746 ; Second Language Research, SAGE Publications, 2008, 24 (3), pp.297-331. ⟨10.1177/0267658308090183⟩ (2008)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; A comparison of the error profiles of monolingual (child L1) learners of Dutch, Moroccan children (child L2) and Moroccan adults (adult L2) learning Dutch as their L2 shows that participants in all groups massively overgeneralize [—neuter] articles to [+neuter] contexts. In all groups, the reverse gender mistake infrequently occurs. Gender expressed by Dutch attributive adjectives reveals an age-related asymmetry between the three groups, however. Whereas participants in the child groups overgeneralize one particular suffix (namely the schwa), adult participants use both adjectival forms, the schwa-adjective and the bare adjective, incorrectly. It is argued that the asymmetry observed in adjectives reflects that adult learners exploit an input-based, lexical learning route, whereas children rely on grammar-based representations. The similarity in article selection between all groups follows from the assumption that adults, like children, make use of lexical frames. Crucially, lexical frames can successfully describe the distribution of gender-marked articles, but they cannot account for gender in adjectives.
|
|
Keyword:
adjectives; age effects; articles; frames; grammatical gender; L1 acquisition; L2 acquisition; rules
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570746/document https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308090183 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570746 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570746/file/PEER_stage2_10.1177%252F0267658308090183.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|