DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 10 of 10

1
Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system
In: Computer speech and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 25 (2011) 1, 105-126
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
2
Benefits and challenges of real-time uncertainty detection and adaptation in a spoken dialogue computer tutor
In: Speech communication. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 53 (2011) 9-10, 1115-1136
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
3
Correlations between dialogue acts and learning in spoken tutoring dialogues
In: Natural language engineering. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 12 (2006) 2, 161-176
BLLDB
Show details
4
Computing discourse semantics : the predicate-argument semantics of discourse connectives in D-LTAG
In: Journal of semantics. - Oxford : Univ. Press 23 (2006) 1, 55-106
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
5
Recognizing student emotions and attitudes on the basis of utterances in spoken tutoring dialogues with both human and computer tutors
In: Speech communication. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 48 (2006) 5, 559-590
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
6
A short introduction to the Penn Discourse TreeBank
In: Treebanking for discourse and speech. - Frederiksberg : Samfundslitteratur (2006), 9-28
BLLDB
Show details
7
Computing Discourse Semantics: The Predicate-Argument Semantics of Discourse Connectives in D-LTAG
Forbes-Riley, Katherine; Webber, Bonnie; Joshi, Aravind. - : Oxford University Press, 2006
Abstract: D-LTAG is a discourse-level extension of lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar (LTAG), in which discourse syntax is projected by different types of discourse connectives and discourse interpretation is a product of compositional rules, anaphora resolution, and inference. In this paper, we present a D-LTAG extension of ongoing work on an LTAG syntax-semantic interface. First, we show how predicate-argument semantics are computed for standard, ‘structural’ discourse connectives. These are connectives that retrieve their semantic arguments from their D-LTAG syntactic tree. Then we focus on discourse connectives that occur syntactically as (usually) fronted adverbials. These connectives do not retrieve both their semantic arguments from a single D-LTAG syntactic tree. Rather, their predicate-argument structure and interpretation distinguish them from structural connectives as well as from other adverbials that do not function as discourse connectives. The unique contribution of this paper lies in showing how compositional rules and anaphora resolution interact within the D-LTAG syntax-semantic interface to yield their semantic interpretations, with multi-component syntactic trees sometimes being required.
Keyword: Articles
URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh032
http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/55
BASE
Hide details
8
Computing Discourse Semantics: The Predicate-Argument Semantics of Discourse Connectives in D-LTAG
Forbes-Riley, Katherine; Webber, Bonnie; Joshi, Aravind. - : Oxford University Press, 2005
BASE
Show details
9
Discourse and information structure
In: Journal of logic, language and information. - Dordrecht [u.a.] : Kluwer 12 (2003) 3, 249-374
BLLDB
Show details
10
Empirical studies of centering shifts and cue phrases as embedded segment boundary markers
In: University of Pennsylvania. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics. - Philadelphia, Pa. : Univ. 7 (2002) 2, 39-57
BLLDB
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
2
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern