DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...12
Hits 1 – 20 of 228

1
Processing Bare Plurals and Indefinites: Evidence from Eye Movements
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Strengthening 'or': Effects of Focus and Downward Entailing Contexts on Scalar Implicatures
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Thematic Relations in Parsing
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
4
Parsing and Constraints on Word Order
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
5
Comprehending Sentences with Multiple Filler-Gap Dependencies
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
6
Reconstruction and Scope
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
7
Finding Candidate Antecedents: Phrases or Conceptual Entities
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
8
Modularity and the Representational Hypothesis
In: North East Linguistics Society (2020)
BASE
Show details
9
A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis [<Journal>]
Clifton, Charles [Verfasser]; Xiang, Ming [Verfasser]; Frazier, Lyn [Verfasser]
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
10
Grammatical approaches to language processing : essays in honor of Lyn Frazier
Carlson, Katy (Herausgeber); Clifton, Charles (Herausgeber); Fodor, Janet Dean (Herausgeber). - Cham : Springer, 2019
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
11
No longer an orphan: evidence for appositive attachment from sentence comprehension
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 32 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
BASE
Show details
12
No longer an orphan: evidence for appositive attachment from sentence comprehension
In: Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series (2018)
BASE
Show details
13
Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing : Studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor
Frazier, Lyn [Herausgeber]; Gibson, Edward [Herausgeber]. - Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2016
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
14
Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing : Studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor
Frazier, Lyn [Herausgeber]; Gibson, Edward [Herausgeber]. - Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
15
Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing: studies in honor of Janet Fodor
Frazier, Lyn (Hrsg.). - Berlin / New York : Springer, 2015
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
16
Superiority in English and German: Cross‐Language Grammatical Differences?
In: Syntax. A journal of theoretical, experimental and interdisciplinary research 18 (2015) 3, 235-265
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
Show details
17
Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing : studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor
Fodor, Janet Dean (Gefeierter); Frazier, Lyn (Herausgeber); Gibson, Edward (Herausgeber). - Cham [u.a.] : Springer, 2015
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
18
Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing : studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor
Frazier, Lyn (Hrsg.); Fodor, Janet Dean (GefeierteR). - Cham [u.a.] : Springer, 2015
IDS Mannheim
Show details
19
Inner voice experiences during processing of direct and indirect speech
Scheepers, Christoph; Yao, Bo. - : Springer International Publishing, 2015
BASE
Show details
20
Do null subjects (mis-)trigger pro-drop grammars?
Frazier, Lyn. - 2015
Abstract: Native speakers of English regularly hear sentences without overt subjects. Nevertheless, they maintain a [−pro] grammar that requires sentences to have an overt subject. It is proposed that listeners of English recognize that speakers reduce predictable material and thus attribute null subjects to this process, rather than changing their grammars to a [+pro] setting. Mack et al. (2012) showed that sentences with noise covering the subject are analyzed as having null subjects more often with a first person pronoun and with a present tense – properties correlated with more predictable referents -- compared to a third person pronoun and past tense. However, those results might in principle have been due to reporting null subjects for verbs that often occur with null subjects. An experiment is reported here in which comparable results are found for sentences containing nonsense verbs. Participants preferred a null subject more often for first person present tense sentences than for third person past tense sentences. The results are as expected if participants are responding to predictability, the likelihood of reduction, rather than to lexical statistics. The results are argued to be important in removing a class of mis-triggering examples from the language acquisition problem.
Keyword: Article
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25086703
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583368/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9312-8
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...12

Catalogues
9
3
48
0
5
0
3
Bibliographies
88
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
27
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
66
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern