1 |
Cognitive and Neural Control in Bilingual Language Processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Cognitive Control Regions are Recruited in Silent Reading of Mixed-language Paragraphs in Bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Distinct Structural Correlates of the Dominant and Nondominant Languages in Bilinguals with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
|
|
|
|
In: Neuropsychologia (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a Measure of Picture Naming Ability in Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Tip of the Tongue After Any Language: Reintroducing the Notion of Blocked Retrieval
|
|
|
|
In: Cognition (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Intact Reversed Language-dominance but not Cognate Effects in Reading aloud of Language Switches in Bilingual Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|
|
|
In: Neuropsychology (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
More Evidence that a Switch is Not (always) a Switch: Binning Bilinguals Reveals Dissociations between Task and Language Switching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
A relative bilingual advantage in switching with preparation: Nuanced explorations of the proposed association between bilingualism and task switching.
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of experimental psychology. General, vol 146, iss 11 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
A Relative Bilingual Advantage in Switching with Preparation: Nuanced Explorations of the Proposed Association Between Bilingualism and Task Switching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Bilingual Language Intrusions and Other Speech Errors in Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
A causal test of the motor theory of speech perception: A case of impaired speech production and spared speech perception
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In the last decade, the debate about the causal role of the motor system in speech perception has been reignited by demonstrations that motor processes are engaged during the processing of speech sounds. However, the exact role of the motor system in auditory speech processing remains elusive. Here we evaluate which aspects of auditory speech processing are affected, and which are not, in a stroke patient with dysfunction of the speech motor system. The patient’s spontaneous speech was marked by frequent phonological/articulatory errors, and those errors were caused, at least in part, by motor-level impairments with speech production. We found that the patient showed a normal phonemic categorical boundary when discriminating two nonwords that differ by a minimal pair (e.g., ADA-AGA). However, using the same stimuli, the patient was unable to identify or label the nonword stimuli (using a button-press response). A control task showed that he could identify speech sounds by speaker gender, ruling out a general labeling impairment. These data suggest that the identification (i.e. labeling) of nonword speech sounds may involve the speech motor system, but that the perception of speech sounds (i.e., discrimination) does not require the motor system. This means that motor processes are not causally involved in perception of the speech signal, and suggest that the motor system may be used when other cues (e.g., meaning, context) are not available.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454743/ https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2015.1035702 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951749
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
What happens to the motor theory of perception when the motor system is damaged?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
What happens to the motor theory of perception when the motor system is damaged?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|