DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 74

1
Editorial: "Quo Vadis, Pragmatics?"
In: Journal of Pragmatics 145 (2019), 1-3
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
Show details
2
What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice
In: Journal of Pragmatics 145 (2019), 72-82
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
Show details
3
Lying and politeness
In: The Oxford handbook of lying (2019), S. 382-396
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
4
The roles of linguistic meaning and context in the concept of lying
BASE
Show details
5
Topic chains in dialogues
Adli, Aria. - : Elsevier, 2019
BASE
Show details
6
Editorial: “Quo Vadis, Pragmatics?”
Terkourafi, Marina; Haugh, Michael. - : Elsevier, 2019
BASE
Show details
7
Discursive (in)stability: Moral subjectivities and global hierarchies in transnational migrant women’s narratives
BASE
Show details
8
The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness
Locher, Miriam A.; Chalupnik, Malgorzata; Bousfield, Derek. - London, United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
9
Pragmatic approaches (im)politeness
Culpeper, Jonathan; Terkourafi, Marina. - : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017
BASE
Show details
10
The linguistic foundations of leadership through actionable consensus
Miller, Bradley. - 2017
Abstract: This dissertation explores the dynamics of consensus building and leadership during a consulting organization’s Senior Leadership Team meetings. By incorporating ethnography with discourse and corpus analyses, I focus on the discursive strategies which drive building actionable consensus. In so doing, I show the linguistic and communicative resources employed in building actionable consensus, allowing for a more complete understanding of both team dynamics and leadership. A large degree of scholarly work has focused on the language of leadership in business settings. These studies fall largely into two camps, one focusing on the display of leader-like identities through discourse and another focusing on the emergence of leadership as a semiotic action which is co-constructed in and through interaction. Both camps have areas to contribute to this literature, though both also have their drawbacks. This study examines both camps and narrows down the focus of leadership to include the building of actionable consensus through interactions. In this dissertation, I address the gaps in studies of the language of leadership by focusing on the ways in which actionable consensus is built. This utilizes methodology developed by Wodak et al. (2011), which incorporates discourse analysis with ethnography and corpus linguistics. By drawing from both quantitative and qualitative analysis, I emphasize a holistic view of leadership as the act of leading, while simultaneously focusing on how that leadership occurs within the context of building actionable consensus. The data for this analysis is drawn from 13 audio-recordings of Senior Leadership Team meetings of a consulting organization. The team is composed of 15 people, each of whom plays a role of leadership within the larger consulting organization. These meetings are primarily conducted for strategic planning and organizational improvements. In addition to these audio-recordings, the study also includes extensive ethnographic and biographical observations of the organization and the individual participants. Appealing to both linguistic and leadership literature, I argue that leadership is directly observable in instances where actionable consensus is built and achieved. Using Wodak et al. (2011) and their methodology for examining the building of actionable consensus, I highlight the linguistic and communicative features which are discursively utilized. I show that these features are co-constructed in discourse and not exclusive to any one individual. I further argue that leadership is the discursive act of proposing a solution to a problem which is subsequently accepted (consensus) by other members of the group. This dissertation shows the ways in which using a combination of Action Implicative Discourse Analysis, corpus linguistics, and ethnographic analysis can offer sufficient theoretical mileage to analyze the co-creation of actionable consensus and the moves of leadership that occur therein. Future research can take a number of different approaches. One suggestion is research which will better describe the role of topic of discussion and its impact on the five discursive strategies discussed in this work. Another potential line of inquiry would examine the role(s) taken on by a single individual, asking how they use the discursive strategies based on varying contexts and conversations.
Keyword: Actionable consensus; Leadership; Sociolinguistics
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97394
BASE
Hide details
11
Exploring the confluence of confianza and national identity in Honduran voseo: a sociopragmatic analysis
BASE
Show details
12
Sociolinguistic effects of mobility: Iranian Azerbaijanis in the U.S.
BASE
Show details
13
Convention and ritual (Im)politeness
Terkourafi, Marina; Kádár, Daniel Z.. - : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017
BASE
Show details
14
The linguistics of politeness and social relations
In: The Routledge handbook of linguistics (London, 2016), p. 221-235
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
15
The evolution of online asexual discourse
BASE
Show details
16
Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness
Terkourafi, Marina (Herausgeber). - Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
17
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness
Terkourafi, Marina (Hrsg.); Defibaugh, Staci (Hrsg.). - Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2015
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
Show details
18
Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research
In: Journal of Pragmatics (JoP) 86 (2015), 11-18
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
19
Introduction : bridging theory and practice in im/politeness research
In: Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (Amsterdam, 2015), p. VII-XI
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
20
The M-word : a Greek collocation between solidarity and insult
In: Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (Amsterdam, 2015), p. 41-70
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
5
0
16
0
0
0
1
Bibliographies
17
0
0
11
1
0
0
0
10
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
24
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern