| 1 |
Serial span predicts vocoded sentence recognition (Bosen & Barry, 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Serial span predicts vocoded sentence recognition (Bosen & Barry, 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Example stimuli in the style of FlexTiles recreated in OCTA ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Example stimuli in the style of FlexTiles recreated in OCTA ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Gender differences in emotion Stroop tasks (Lin et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Gender differences in emotion Stroop tasks (Lin et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the Stroop effects of verbal and nonverbal cues and their relative impacts on gender differences in unisensory and multisensory emotion perception. Method: Experiment 1 investigated how well 88 normal Chinese adults (43 women and 45 men) could identify emotions conveyed through face, prosody and semantics as three independent channels. Experiments 2 and 3 further explored gender differences during multisensory integration of emotion through a cross-channel (prosody-semantics) and a cross-modal (face-prosody-semantics) Stroop task, respectively, in which 78 participants (41 women and 37 men) were asked to selectively attend to one of the two or three communication channels. Results: The integration of accuracy and reaction time data indicated that paralinguistic cues (i.e., face and prosody) of emotions were consistently more salient than linguistic ones (i.e., semantics) throughout the study. Additionally, women demonstrated advantages in processing all three types of ...
|
|
Keyword:
170112 Sensory Processes, Perception and Performance; FOS Psychology; Gender studies
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.23641/asha.16435599.v1
https://asha.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Gender_differences_in_emotion_Stroop_tasks_Lin_et_al_2021_/16435599/1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
