| 2 |
Assessing agrammatic aphasia (Dyson et al., 2022) ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: There is mounting evidence that the agrammatism that defines Broca’s aphasia can be explained in processing terms. However, the extant approach simply describes agrammatism as disparate deficits in a static, mature system. This tutorial aims to motivate and outline a developmental alternative. This alternative is processability theory (PT), a root-to-apex theory of language development, with its origins in the field of second language acquisition, which can connect the findings of aphasia research. Method: This tutorial critically reviews research on agrammatism as a language deficit, a representational deficit, and a processing phenomenon. Given evidence from research applying PT to language disorders, this tutorial outlines PT’s multidimensional architecture of language processing. Using an emergence (onset) criterion, PT predicts fixed developmental stages in word order (syntax) and inflection (morphology) and individual differences in the timing of syntax and morphology. To link PT to ...
|
|
Keyword:
Natural language processing; Neurology and neuromuscular diseases; Speech pathology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.23641/asha.19416488.v1
https://asha.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_agrammatic_aphasia_Dyson_et_al_2022_/19416488/1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Developmental stages challenging cross-linguistic transfer: L2 acquisition of Norwegian adjectival agreement in attributive and predicative contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of the European Second Language Association; Vol 5, No 1 (2021); 54–69 ; 2399-9101 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Receptive L2 Grammar Knowledge Development in Bilingual Preschools
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
