1 |
The Role of Input in Language Revitalization: The Case of Lexical Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Non-Māori-speaking New Zealanders have a Māori proto-lexicon
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The Role of Input in Language Revitalization: The Case of Lexical Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The Role of Input in Language Revitalization: The Case of Lexical Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Non-Māori-speaking New Zealanders have a Māori proto-lexicon
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Social categories are shared across bilinguals’ lexicons ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
“Are we doing the right thing?” How Korean immigrant families practise their family language policies in monolingual-focused New Zealand ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
“Are we doing the right thing?” How Korean immigrant families practise their family language policies in monolingual-focused New Zealand ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Tuhinga Māhorahora: tracking vocabulary use in children’s writing in Māori
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Social categories are shared across bilinguals׳ lexicons
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Dialects and languages are socially meaningful signals that provide indexical and linguistic information to listeners. Are the indexical categories that are shared across languages used in cross-linguistic processing? To answer this question English (L1)-Māori (L2) bilingual New Zealanders participated in a priming experiment which included English-to-Māori and Māori-to-English translation equivalents, and within-language repetition priming for Māori and English. Half of the English words were produced by standard New Zealand English (Pākehā English) speakers and half by Māori English speakers. We find robust evidence for within-language repetition priming for both Māori-only and English-only trials. Across languages, there is L1–L2 priming: both Pākehā English and Māori English successfully prime Māori. The effect size, however, is larger for Māori English–Māori trials than Pākehā English–Māori trials. In the L2–L1 direction Māori only primes Māori English, not Pākehā English. These results support the hypothesis that indexical categories – e.g., ethnic identity – facilitate word recognition across languages, particularly in the L2–L1 direction, where translation priming has not always been obtained in the literature. Lexical items and pronunciation variants are activated through conceptual links and social links during bilingual speech processing. ; 18 page(s)
|
|
Keyword:
Auditory priming; Bilingual speech perception; Māori; Sociophonetics
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1187454
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Tuhinga Mahorahora: a corpus of Maori writing by children
|
|
King, Jeanette; Brown, Christine; Boyce, Mary. - : University of Canterbury. Aotahi School of Maori and Indigenous Studies, 2015. : University of Canterbury. AVC Maori, 2015. : University of Canterbury. New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain & Behaviour, 2015
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Tuhinga Māhorahora: analyzing words to support teachers in Māori immersion classrooms
|
|
King, Jeanette; Brown, Christine; Boyce, Mary. - : University of Canterbury. Aotahi School of Māori and Indigenous Studies, 2015. : University of Canterbury. AVC Māori, 2015. : University of Canterbury. New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain & Behaviour, 2015
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|