| 1 |
Assessing Intervention Effects in Sentence Processing: Object Relatives vs. Subject Control
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
Object relative clauses are harder to process than subject relative clauses. Under Grillo’s (2009) Generalized Minimality framework, complexity effects of object relatives are construed as intervention effects, which result from an interaction between locality constraints on movement (Relativized Minimality) and the sentence processing system. Specifically, intervention of the subject DP in the movement dependency is expected to generate a minimality violation whenever processing limitations render the moved object underspecified, resulting in compromised comprehension. In the present study, assuming Generalized Minimality, we compared the processing of object relatives with the processing of subject control in ditransitives, which, like object relatives, instantiates a syntactic dependency across an intervening DP. This comparison is justified by the current debate on whether Control should be analyzed as movement: if control involves movement of the controller DP, as proposed by Hornstein (1999), a parallel between the processing of object relatives and subject control in ditransitives may be anticipated on the basis of intervention. In addition, we explored whether general cognitive factors contribute to complexity effects ascribed to movement across a DP. Sixty-nine adult speakers of European Portuguese read sentences and answered comprehension probes in a self-paced reading task with moving-window display, comprising four experimental conditions: Subject Relatives; Object Relatives; Subject Control; Object Control. Furthermore, participants performed four supplementary tasks, serving as measures of resistance to interference, lexical knowledge, working memory capacity and lexical access ability. The results from the reading task showed that whereas object relatives were harder to process than subject relatives, subject control was not harder to process than object control, arguing against recent movement accounts of control. Furthermore, we found that whereas object relative complexity effects assessed by response times to comprehension probes interacted with Reading Span, object relative complexity effects assessed by comprehension accuracy and reading times did not interact with any of the supplementary tasks. We discuss these results in light of Generalized Minimality and the hypothesis of modularity in syntactic processing (Caplan and Waters, 1999).
|
|
Keyword:
Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610909
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884622/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 2 |
A contribuição dos esquemas semânticos para as facetas lexical e episódica de novas palavras em jovens adultos
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Avaliação de capacidades cognitivas não-verbais na afasia de etiologia vascular
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Dimensões estruturais dos objectos : do reconhecimento à nomeação
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
A cor como veículo de comunicação - o design gráfico como ferramenta de visualização da cor na filmografia de Pedro Almodóvar
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
