1 |
The effects of lexical content, acoustic and linguistic variability, and vocoding on voice cue perception
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0001-4966 ; EISSN: 1520-8524 ; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03406311 ; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America, 2021, 150 (3), pp.1620 - 1634. ⟨10.1121/10.0005938⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users
|
|
|
|
In: Otol Neurotol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
VariaNTS corpus: A spoken Dutch corpus containing talker and linguistic variability ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
VariaNTS corpus: A spoken Dutch corpus containing talker and linguistic variability ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning
|
|
|
|
In: J Am Acad Audiol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire
|
|
|
|
In: J Am Acad Audiol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Are There Real-world Benefits to Bimodal Listening?
|
|
|
|
In: Otol Neurotol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Variation in the strength of lexical encoding across dialects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition
|
|
|
|
In: PMC (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO
|
|
|
|
In: PMC (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Influence of early linguistic experience on regional dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study
|
|
|
|
In: PMC (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Influence of Early Linguistic Experience on Regional Dialect Categorization by an Adult Cochlear Implant User: A Case Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Effects of dialect and talker variability on lexical recognition memory
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The current study investigated recognition memory for dialect variation in a recognition memory experiment with separate training and test phases. In the training phase, participants were asked to identify words spoken by three female talkers from the Midland dialect region and three female talkers from the Northern dialect region. In the test phase, participants listened to another set of words and were asked to indicate whether each word was from the training phase, “old,” or completely new, “new.” In this phase of the experiment, half of the words were “old,” having been previously introduced in the training phase, and half were “new,” not having been introduced in the training phase. Of the “old” words, one-third were repeated by the same talker, one-third were repeated by a different talker from the same dialect region, and one-third were repeated by a different talker from a different dialect region. Based on previous research, it was expected that, for each original dialect, participants would be the most accurate and quickest for the “old” words that were repeated by the same talker, the least accurate and slowest for the “old” words that were repeated by a different talker from a different dialect region, and somewhat in between for the “old” words repeated by a different talker from the same dialect region. The results of this study indicate that episodic memory traces of spoken words retain fine-grained surface details, as found in Goldinger (1996) and Palmeri et al. (1993), as responses to same-talker repetitions were generally more accurate and faster than responses to different-talker same-dialect and different-talker different-dialect repetitions. In addition, response time patterns suggest that both abstract lexical representations and episodic traces are stored in long-term memory and contribute to perception. Finally, the significant vowel interactions provide some evidence that dialect information is implicitly coded by the listener, though further studies are needed to better understand this result. ; This project was supported by the Colleges of the Arts and Sciences Undergraduate Research Award from the Ohio State University for 2007-2008 and the Undergraduate Research Award in the Humanities from the Ohio State University for 2007. ; No embargo
|
|
Keyword:
dialect variation; word recognition
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/32215
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|