1 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the collaboration of aphasia trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
|
|
Behn, Nicholas; Harrison, Madeleine; Brady, Marian C.; Breitenstein, Caterina; Carragher, Marcella; Fridriksson, Julius; Godecke, Erin; Hillis, Argye; Kelly, Helen; Palmer, Rebecca; Rose, Miranda L.; Thomas, Shirley; Tippett, Donna; Worrall, Linda; Becker, Frank; Hilari, Katerina
|
|
In: Research outputs 2022 to 2026 (2022)
|
|
Abstract:
Background: Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity are essential and integral components to the design of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in stroke and aphasia. Treatment fidelity refers to the degree to which an intervention is delivered as intended and is directly related to the quality of the evidence generated by RCTs. Clear documentation of treatment fidelity in trials assists in the evaluation of the clinical implications of potential benefits attributed to the intervention. Consideration of the implementation requirements of a research-based intervention as intended in a clinical context is necessary to achieve similar outcomes for a clinical population. Despite this, treatment fidelity is rarely reported in RCTs of aphasia intervention. Aim: To describe fidelity strategies and develop core recommendations for developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia intervention RCTs. Scope: Relevant conceptual frameworks were considered. The Behaviour Change Consortium comprehensive framework of fidelity was adopted. It includes five areas: study design, training providers, delivery of treatment, treatment receipt, and treatment enactment. We explored fidelity in RCTs with a range of complex aphasia interventions (e.g., ASK, Big CACTUS, COMPARE, FCET2EC, POLAR, SUPERB, and VERSE) and described how different trial design factors (e.g., phase of trial, explanatory vs. pragmatic, number and location of sites, and number and type of treatment providers) influenced the fidelity strategies chosen. Strategies were mapped onto the five areas of the fidelity framework with a detailed exploration of how fidelity criteria were developed, measured, and monitored throughout each trial. This information was synthesised into a set of core recommendations to guide aphasia researchers towards the adequate measurement, capture, and reporting of fidelity within future aphasia intervention studies. Conclusions/Recommendations: Treatment fidelity should be a core consideration in planning an intervention trial, a concept that goes beyond treatment adherence alone. A range of strategies should be selected depending on the phase and design of the trial being undertaken and appropriate investment of time and costs should be considered.
|
|
Keyword:
adherence; Aphasia; fidelity; Medicine and Health Sciences; recommendations; trials
|
|
URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=ecuworks2022-2026 https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/407
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
5 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0268-7038 ; EISSN: 1464-5041 ; Aphasiology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03528818 ; Aphasiology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2021, ⟨10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0039-2499 ; EISSN: 1524-4628 ; Stroke ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277820 ; Stroke, American Heart Association, 2021, 52 (5), pp.1778-1787. ⟨10.1161/strokeaha.120.031162⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Core outcome set use in aphasia treatment research (Wallace et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Core outcome set use in aphasia treatment research (Wallace et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Posttraumatic growth following aphasia: a prospective cohort study of the first year post-stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Many ways of measuring: a scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane evidence-based language test
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
A narrative review of communication accessibility for people with aphasia and implications for multi-disciplinary goal setting after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Prognostication in post‐stroke aphasia: how do speech pathologists formulate and deliver information about recovery?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|