1 |
If pictures are stative, what does this mean for discourse interpretation? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
If pictures are stative, what does this mean for discourse interpretation?
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 19-36 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 19-36 ; 2629-6055 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Factors licensing embedded present tense in speech reports
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 22 Nr. 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 127-142 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 22 No 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 127-142 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Moment of Change, Cessation Implecatures and Simultaneous Readings
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 17 (2013): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17; 45-62 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 17 (2013): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17; 45-62 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
A birelational analysis of the Russian imperfective
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 14 (2010): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14; 1-18 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 14 (2010): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14; 1-18 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Double access
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 89-106 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 89-106 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Factors licensing embedded present tense in speech reports ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
According to Ogihara (1995), the usage of the embedded present in a speech report such as John said that Mary is in the room is restricted by the cause of John’s belief (the state that made John think that Mary is in the room): the present tense can be used only if this cause still holds at the time that John said that Mary is in the room is uttered. This paper presents experimental evidence demonstrating that this is only one of the factors that licenses a felicitous usage of the embedded present tense. In particular, we show that the cause of belief still holding is not a necessary condition, and identify two additional, sufficient (but not necessary) factors: in cases of false belief, who is aware of the falsity of the belief and duration of the reported state. While these factors are independent, they collectively support the idea that the present tense encodes ‘current relevance’, even in embedded contexts (e.g. Costa 1972; McGilvray 1974). This gives rise to the question of how we can derive ‘current ... : ZAS Papers in Linguistics, Bd. 60 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, 1 ...
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.60.2018.458 https://zaspil.leibniz-zas.de/article/view/458
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
'Now' with Subordinate Clauses
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 27; 358-376 ; 2163-5951 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
An argument for definitional adequacy of RESULT and NARRATION
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 25; 38-56 ; 2163-5951 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
On double access, cessation and parentheticality
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 25; 18-37 ; 2163-5951 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
There is no neutral aspect
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 23; 40-62 ; 2163-5951 (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|