| 1 |
Transitivity and Evaluation in American and Spanish Parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain
|
|
|
|
In: Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A.B.(2022). Transitivity and Evaluation in American and Spanish Parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain. Critical Discourse Studies (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Metaphor, metonymy and evaluation as political devices in American and Spanish parliamentary political discourse
|
|
|
|
In: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE ), ISSN 1139-7241, Nº. 40, 2020, pags. 75-100 (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
The present study explores the interplay of metaphor, metonymy and evaluation in an American and Spanish parliamentary speech by President Obama and PM Rajoy, aiming at convincing the public of economic victory through positive selfevaluation and other-deprecation. A further objective is to investigate whether there is a relationship between the speakers’ ideological positions and the entities that are evaluated. Within the general framework of CDA for parliamentary debates (van Dijk, 2005), we use Martin and White’s Appraisal scheme as an analytical tool. The results reveal that both political candidates used evaluation in their speeches as a tool to justify and persuade the audience of their economic decisions. On the other hand, both politicians used evaluation, not as an expression of their own ideological traits, but also as an ideological tool that would favor their intentions of rising to power ; Este estudio investiga la interacción entre metáfora, metonimia y evaluación en un discurso parlamentario del Presidente Obama y del Presidente del Gobierno Rajoy cuyo objetivo es convencer a la audiencia de recuperación económica por medio de las estrategias de presentación positiva de sí mismo y negativa del contrario. Otro objetivo es analizar si hay una relación entre las posturas ideológicas de los candidatos y las entidades evaluadas. Dentro del marco general de Análisis del Discurso para los debates parlamentarios (van Dijk, 2005) utilizamos el modelo de Evaluación de Martin y White como herramienta de análisis. Los resultados indican que los políticos utilizaron evaluación en sus discursos como herramienta para justificar sus decisiones económicas y para persuadir a la audiencia. Por otra parte, los dos utilizaron la evaluación, no sólo como expresión de sus características ideológicas, sino también como instrumento para alcanzar el poder
|
|
Keyword:
debate parlamentario; evaluación; evaluation; metáfora; metaphor; metonimia; metonymy; parliamentary speech; persuasión; persuasion
|
|
URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7829114
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Manipulation in Spanish and American pre-electoral debates: the Rajoy-Rubalcaba vs. Obama-McCain debates.
|
|
|
|
In: Cabrejas Peñuelas, Ana Belén 2015 Manipulation in Spanish and American pre-electoral debates: the Rajoy-Rubalcaba vs. Obama-McCain debates. Intercultural Pragmatics 12 4 515 546 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
A comparison of an effective and an ineffective writer's mental representations of their audience, rhetorical purpose and composing strategies
|
|
|
|
In: RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada, ISSN 1885-9089, Nº. 7, 2008, pags. 90-114 (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
