1 |
Left Motor delta Oscillations Reflect Asynchrony Detection in Multisensory Speech Perception
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Distinct Neural Networks Relate to Common and Speaker-Specific Language Priors
|
|
|
|
In: Cereb Cortex Commun (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Effective natural communication requires listeners to incorporate not only very general linguistic principles which evolved during a lifetime but also other information like the specific individual language use of a particular interlocutor. Traditionally, research has focused on the general linguistic rules, and brain science has shown a left hemispheric fronto-temporal brain network related to this processing. The present fMRI research explores speaker-specific individual language use because it is unknown whether this processing is supported by similar or distinct neural structures. Twenty-eight participants listened to sentences of persons who used more easy or difficult language. This was done by manipulating the proportion of easy SOV vs. complex OSV sentences for each speaker. Furthermore, ambiguous probe sentences were included to test top-down influences of speaker information in the absence of syntactic structure information. We observed distinct neural processing for syntactic complexity and speaker-specific language use. Syntactic complexity correlated with left frontal and posterior temporal regions. Speaker-specific processing correlated with bilateral (right-dominant) fronto-parietal brain regions. Finally, the top-down influence of speaker information was found in frontal and striatal brain regions, suggesting a mechanism for controlled syntactic processing. These findings show distinct neural networks related to general language principles as well as speaker-specific individual language use.
|
|
Keyword:
Original Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgaa021 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153046/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
3 |
Young children’s sentence comprehension: Neural correlates of syntax-semantic competition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Contributions of left frontal and temporal cortex to sentence comprehension: Evidence from simultaneous TMS-EEG
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Don’t Get Me Wrong: ERP Evidence from Cueing Communicative Intentions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Dyslexia risk gene relates to representation of sound in the auditory brainstem
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The right touch: Stroking of CT-innervated skin promotes vocal emotion processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Temporal signatures of processing voiceness and emotion in sound
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Don’t Get Me Wrong: ERP Evidence from Cueing Communicative Intentions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Dyslexia risk gene relates to representation of sound in the auditory brainstem
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Auditory Discrimination Between Function Words in Children and Adults: A Mismatch Negativity Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Inconsistent use of gesture space during abstract pointing impairs language comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Distinguishing Neurocognitive Processes Reflected by P600 Effects: Evidence from ERPs and Neural Oscillations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The time course of lexical access in morphologically complex words
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|