1 |
Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
SLRM: A Non-Linguistic Test for Audiology Clinics
|
|
|
|
In: Ear Hear (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Contributions of Electric and Acoustic Hearing to Bimodal Speech and Music Perception
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Improving Speech Perception in Noise with Current Focusing in Cochlear Implant Users
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Cochlear implant (CI) users typically have excellent speech recognition in quiet but struggle with understanding speech in noise. It is thought that broad current spread from stimulating electrodes causes adjacent electrodes to activate overlapping populations of neurons which results in interactions across adjacent channels. Current focusing has been studied as a way to reduce spread of excitation, and therefore, reduce channel interactions. In particular, partial tripolar stimulation has been shown to reduce spread of excitation relative to monopolar stimulation. However, the crucial question is whether this benefit translates to improvements in speech perception. In this study, we compared speech perception in noise with experimental monopolar and partial tripolar speech processing strategies. The two strategies were matched in terms of number of active electrodes, microphone, filterbanks, stimulation rate and loudness (although both strategies used a lower stimulation rate than typical clinical strategies). The results of this study showed a significant improvement in speech perception in noise with partial tripolar stimulation. All subjects benefited from the current focused speech processing strategy. There was a mean improvement in speech recognition threshold of 2.7 dB in a digits in noise task and a mean improvement of 3 dB in a sentences in noise task with partial tripolar stimulation relative to monopolar stimulation. Although the experimental monopolar strategy was worse than the clinical, presumably due to different microphones, frequency allocations and stimulation rates, the experimental partial-tripolar strategy, which had the same changes, showed no acute deficit relative to the clinical.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23467170 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639477 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|