2 |
Contact, variation and change in Romance and beyond | Kontakt, Variation und Wandel in und jenseits der Romania : Studies in honor of Trudel Meisenburg | Festschrift für Trudel Meisenburg
|
|
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Contact, variation and change in Romance and beyond : studies in honor of Trudel Meisenburg = Kontakt, Variation und Wandel in und jenseits der Romania : Festschrift für Trudel Meisenburg
|
|
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Extraction from DP in French: A minimalist approach ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This article is about the extraction of French PP complements of nouns headed by de, mostly in wh and relative clause contexts. After a review of the literature on extraction in French, it addresses the issue of the constraints on extraction in cases with multiple arguments, eventually following Kolliakou (1999) in assuming that there can only be one argument of a noun, whereas other expressions are adjuncts. I then explain the relevant extractions within the Minimalist Program: on the assumption that DPs are phases, an extracted item must first move to the phase edge, as assumed in previous accounts. The exact extraction mechanism is then modeled by assuming a phi-probe plus an unvalued operator feature on the D head. The fact that only complements introduced by the preposition de can be extracted from the DP is explained by considering de as a post-syntactic marking for genitive case, which is assigned by the phi-probe. ...
|
|
URL: https://zenodo.org/record/3458078 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3458078
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|