2 |
Musical Experience, Sensorineural Auditory Processing, and Reading Subskills in Adults
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Stability and Plasticity of Auditory Brainstem Function Across the Lifespan
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
An acoustic gap between the NICU and womb: a potential risk for compromised neuroplasticity of the auditory system in preterm infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Bilingualism increases neural response consistency and attentional control: Evidence for sensory and cognitive coupling
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Neural processing of speech in children is influenced by bilingual experience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
An acoustic gap between the NICU and womb: a potential risk for compromised neuroplasticity of the auditory system in preterm infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Longitudinal Effects of Group Music Instruction on Literacy Skills in Low-Income Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Impoverished Brain: Disparities in Maternal Education Affect the Neural Response to Sound
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Cross-phaseogram: Objective neural index of speech sound differentiation
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We introduce a new approach, the cross-phaseogram, which captures the brain’s ability to discriminate between spectrotemporally dynamic speech sounds, such as stop consonants. The goal was to develop an analysis technique for auditory brainstem responses (ABR) that taps into the sub-millisecond temporal precision of the response but does not rely on subjective identification of individual response peaks. Using the cross-phaseogram technique, we show that time-varying frequency differences in speech stimuli manifest as phase differences in ABRs. By applying this automated and objective technique to a large dataset, we found these phase differences to be less pronounced in children who perform below average on a standardized test of listening to speech in noise. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our results, and the extension of the cross-phaseogram method to a wider range of stimuli and populations.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.020 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21277896 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056886
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Brainstem Correlates of Speech-in-Noise Perception in Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Stimulus Rate and Subcortical Auditory Processing of Speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|