| 3 |
Grammatical convergence or microvariation? Subject doubling in English in a French dominant town
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 4 (2019): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 17:1–15 ; 2473-8689 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Sociophonetic Variation and Change in Northern Ontario English Vowels
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This thesis presents the first sociophonetic analysis of vowel variation and change in Temiskaming Shores (population 9,920) and Kirkland Lake (population 7,981), two small communities in northern Ontario. I compare the speech of these two communities to that of Toronto, Ontario, the largest and most linguistically diverse city in Canada (population 2,731,571), and Thunder Bay, Ontario (population 107,909), a smaller urban centre 950 km northwest of Temiskaming Shores and Kirkland Lake and 1400 km northwest of Toronto. I analyze four vowel variables: Canadian Raising, the phonologically conditioned raising of the onset of front upgliding and back upgliding diphthongs /aɪ/ (as in the word price) and /aʊ/ (as in mouth) before voiceless consonants, the merger of the low back vowels /ɑ/ (as in lot) and /ɔ/ (as in thought), the Canadian Shift, the retraction and lowering of the front lax vowels /ɪ/ (as in kit) and /ɛ/ (as in dress) and /æ/ (as in trap), and the fronting of the high back vowel /u/ (as in goose). The data for the project comprises over 52,000 tokens of Canadian English vowels in 11 vowel categories drawn from two large corpora of Canadian English and based on a speaker sample that is stratified by community, age, and sex. I use linear mixed-effects regression models fit to Lobanov-normalized F1 and F2 of each vowel token to analyze the influence of the social factors of community, sex, and age, as well as the linguistic factors of following and preceding phonetic context on each phonological variable. The main findings of the thesis are that despite some regional differences, the vowel systems of Kirkland Lake and Temiskaming Shores are essentially similar to those of Toronto and Thunder Bay, and that this underlying stability corroborates the longstanding claim of homogeneity of English across Canada. ; Ph.D.
|
|
Keyword:
0636; Canadian English; Language variation; Phonetics
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/92133
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Is one innovation enough? Leaders, covariation and language change
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Perspectives on linguistic documentation from sociolinguistic research on dialects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Perspectives on linguistic documentation from sociolinguistic research on dialects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Syntactic Categories Informing Variationist Analysis: The Case of English Copy-raising
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Why Does Canadian English Use try to but British English Use try and? Let's Try and/to Figure It Out
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Comparative Sociolinguistic Insights in the Evolution of Negation
|
|
|
|
In: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
