DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hits 1 – 20 of 117

1
Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters. ...
Kinoshita, Sachiko; Yu, Lili; Verdonschot, Rinus G. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters.
Kinoshita, Sachiko; Yu, Lili; Verdonschot, Rinus G. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021. : Mem Cognit, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
The proximate unit in Korean speech production: Phoneme or syllable? ...
BASE
Show details
4
QJE-STD-19-438.R2-Supplementary_Material – Supplemental material for The proximate unit in Korean speech production: Phoneme or syllable? ...
BASE
Show details
5
QJE-STD-19-438.R2-Supplementary_Material – Supplemental material for The proximate unit in Korean speech production: Phoneme or syllable? ...
BASE
Show details
6
The proximate unit in Korean speech production: Phoneme or syllable? ...
BASE
Show details
7
Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task. ...
Boudelaa, Sami; Norris, Dennis; Mahfoudhi, Abdesattar. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2019
BASE
Show details
8
Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.
Boudelaa, Sami; Norris, Dennis; Mahfoudhi, Abdesattar. - : American Psychological Association (APA), 2019. : J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2019
BASE
Show details
9
Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task. ...
Kinoshita, Sachiko; Gayed, Michael; Norris, Dennis. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
Norris, Dennis; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Hall, Jane. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
11
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
Norris, Dennis; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Hall, Jane. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
12
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords? ...
Schubert, Teresa; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Norris, Dennis. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2018
BASE
Show details
13
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
Norris, Dennis; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Hall, Jane. - : Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2018
BASE
Show details
14
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?
Schubert, Teresa; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Norris, Dennis. - : SAGE Publications, 2018. : Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 2018
Abstract: Nonwords created by transposing two non-adjacent orthographic consonants (CONDISER) have been reported to produce more priming for their baseword (CONSIDER), and to be classified as a nonword less readily than nonwords created by transposing two orthographic vowels (CINSODER). We investigate the origin of this difference and its relevance for theories of letter position coding. In the unprimed versions of the lexical decision and same-different tasks, a consonant-vowel difference was found in the transposition condition, not when those letters are substituted (Experiment 1). We found that when transpositions involved the disruption of a consonant cluster (OPMITAL), reaction times were slowed compared to when transpositions involved only letters that are separated (CHOLOCATE; Experiment 2). As transpositions more frequently disrupt in consonant clusters than vowel clusters, this introduces a confound in studies investigating consonant and vowel transposition effects. Consistent with the idea that letter order is harder to resolve in clusters, the difference between consonants and vowels was eliminated when transpositions involve singleton consonants or vowels rather than those in clusters (Experiment 3). These results suggest that the precision of position coding does not differ between consonants and vowels, but that consonant-vowel status plays a role in structuring orthographic representations.
Keyword: Decision Making; Female; Humans; Male; Perception; Photic Stimulation; Psycholinguistics; Psychology; Reaction Time; Recognition; Students; Universities; Vocabulary
URL: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.22522
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/275334
BASE
Hide details
15
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?
Norris, Dennis; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Hall, Jane. - : Informa UK Limited, 2018. : Lang Cogn Neurosci, 2018
BASE
Show details
16
Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.
Gayed, Michael; Norris, Dennis; Kinoshita, Sachiko. - : American Psychological Association (APA), 2018. : J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2018
BASE
Show details
17
Orthographic and Phonological Priming Effects in the Same–Different Task
Kinoshita, Sachiko; Gayed, Michael; Norris, Dennis. - : American Psychological Association, 2018
BASE
Show details
18
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?
BASE
Show details
19
The Magic of words reconsidered : investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task
Kinoshita, Sachiko; De Wit, Bianca; Norris, Dennis. - : American Psychological Association, 2017
BASE
Show details
20
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?
Schubert, Teresa; Kinoshita, Sachiko; Norris, Dennis. - : SAGE Publications, 2017
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Catalogues
1
0
29
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
69
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern