| 1 |
The processing cost of Downward Entailingness: the representation and verification of comparative constructions [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 60 (2018), 435-451
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Linguistic barriers to logical reasoning: a new perspective on Aristotelian syllogisms [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 60 (2018), 453-468
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Target article A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Brocas Aphasia q
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Drai_Grodzinsky_BL_2006a.pdf (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Levels of Linguistic Representation in Broca’s Aphasia: Implicitness and Referentiality of Arguments
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/bast.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Comprehension regularity in Broca’s aphasia: There’s more of it than you ever imagined. Brain and Language 70:139–43
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/drai99.pdf (1999)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: comprehension regularities in Broca’s aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/gpzd.pdf (1999)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Tense and Agreement in Agrammatic Production: Pruning the Syntactic Tree
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/docs/fg1997.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
TeI Aviv University
|
|
|
|
In: http://las.sagepub.com/content/31/2/115.full.pdf (1987)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (Eds.) The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 84-104). Longman. SPLIT INFLECTION IN NEUROLINGUISTICS
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.language-brain.com/docs/Friedmann_Grodzinsky_2000_split_infl.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
Since Pollock’s 1989 paper, much linguistic argumentation has been mounted in favor of the split inflection hypothesis. This paper presents evidence from a neuropsychological angle in support of this hypothesis. Given that agrammatic aphasic patients demonstrate a selective deficit in the syntactic domain, it is tempting to look for impairment patterns that pertain to issues debated in current syntactic theory. Some arguments from agrammatism to linguistics have already been put forth in the past (cf. Grodzinsky, 1990; Grodzinsky, Wexler, Chien, Marakovitz & Solomon, 1993). We will focus on the inflectional domain, and show that the agrammatic selective breakdown pattern follows the exact same line that the theory sketches between subparts of inflection: tense and agreement. Thus, we will present corroborating evidence to the theory, by showing how natural classes within it behave differentially in aphasia. In addition, we will show that the impairment in tense node has implications upon higher nodes in the syntactic tree. We believe that these claims are relevant to anyone interested in psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic aspects of the theory of syntax. Moreover, they are of special interest to students of language acquisition, where somewhat parallel (yet very different) developments have taken place, and in fact, inspired us in our investigation (cf. Rizzi, 1994). This study is a detailed examination of the speech production abilities in agrammatic aphasic patients. Agrammatism is a language deficit following damage to Broca’s area in the left cerebral hemisphere, (cf. Damasio, 1992; Zurif, 1995). It is usually viewed as an impairment to functional elements (or “grammatical morphemes ” in common use). However, this description is far too crude, and as will become apparent below, a precise description of the fine patterns of impairment and sparing in this syndrome requires a lot of syntactic machinery. The standard view is that all functional elements are impaired in the production of
|
|
URL: http://www.language-brain.com/docs/Friedmann_Grodzinsky_2000_split_infl.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.70.4645
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Split Inflection in Neurolinguistics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/docs/split_infl.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The syntactic characterization of agrammatlsm*
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Grodzinsky_COG_84.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Printed in the United States of America The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.psych.yorku.ca/gigi/documents/Grodzinsky_2000.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A blueprint for a brain map of syntax1
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Grodzinsky_BR.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
* To whom correspondence should be addressed:
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Santi Grodzinsky HBM in press.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
VARIATION IN BROCA’S REGION: PRELIMINARY CROSS-METHODOLOGICAL COMPARISONS
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Gen.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
1 To appear in the Canadian Journal of Lingustics, special 50th anniversary issue Syntactic Dependencies as Memorized Sequences in the Brain
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/CJL_05.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
OFFICE HOURS by appointment
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/linguistics/LING619_W09.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
