Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Hits 1 – 15 of 15

1	Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
	Peters, Jessica L.; Bavin, Edith L.; Brown, Alyse...
	In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, no. 1 (Dec 2020), 21638 (2020)
	BASE
	Show details

2	Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
	Peters, Jessica L.; Bavin, Edith L.; Brown, Alyse. - : Nature Publishing Group UK, 2020. : Scientific Reports, 2020
	BASE
	Show details

3	Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup.
	Peters, Jessica L; Bavin, Edith L; Brown, Alyse. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020. : Sci Rep, 2020
	BASE
	Show details

4	Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
	Peters, Jessica L.; Bavin, Edith L.; Brown, Alyse...
	In: Sci Rep (2020)
	BASE
	Show details

5	Preliminary validation of FastaReada as a measure of reading fluency
	Crewther, David P.; Crewther, Sheila G.; Bavin, Edith L....
	In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6 (Oct 2015), article no. 1634 (2015)
	BASE
	Show details

6	Preliminary validation of FastaReada as a measure of reading fluency
	Elhassan, Zena; Crewther, Sheila G.; Bavin, Edith L.; Crewther, David P.. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2015
	Abstract: Fluent reading is characterized by speed and accuracy in the decoding and comprehension of connected text. Although a variety of measures are available for the assessment of reading skills most tests do not evaluate rate of text recognition as reflected in fluent reading. Here we evaluate FastaReada, a customized computer-generated task that was developed to address some of the limitations of currently available measures of reading skills. FastaReada provides a rapid assessment of reading fluency quantified as words read per minute for connected, meaningful text. To test the criterion validity of FastaReada, 124 mainstream school children with typical sensory, mental and motor development were assessed. Performance on FastaReada was correlated with the established Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA) measures of text reading accuracy, rate and comprehension, and common single word measures of pseudoword (non-word) reading, phonetic decoding, phonological awareness (PA) and mode of word decoding (i.e., visual or eidetic versus auditory or phonetic). The results demonstrated strong positive correlations between FastaReada performance and NARA reading rate (r = 0.75), accuracy (r = 0.83) and comprehension (r = 0.63) scores providing evidence for criterion-related validity. Additional evidence for criterion validity was demonstrated through strong positive correlations between FastaReada and both single word eidetic (r = 0.81) and phonetic decoding skills (r = 0.68). The results also demonstrated FastaReada to be a stronger predictor of eidetic decoding than the NARA rate measure, with FastaReada predicting 14.4% of the variance compared to 2.6% predicted by NARA rate. FastaReada was therefore deemed to be a valid tool for educators, clinicians, and research related assessment of reading accuracy and rate. As expected, analysis with hierarchical regressions also highlighted the closer relationship of fluent reading to rapid visual word recognition than to phonological-based skills. Eidetic decoding was the strongest predictor of FastaReada performance (16.8%) followed by phonetic decoding skill (1.7%). PA did not make a unique contribution after eidetic decoding and phonetic decoding skills were accounted for.
	Keyword: Psychology
	URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01634 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621297/
	BASE
	Hide details

7	I RAN Fast and I Remembered What I Read: The Relationship between Reading, Rapid Automatic Naming, and Auditory and Visual Short-Term Memory
	Crewther, Sheila G.; Thomson, Brenda; Laycock, Robin. - : SAGE Publications, 2011
	BASE
	Show details

8	Intellectual disability: beyond IQ scores
	Goharpey, Nahal; Crewther, David P.; Crewther, Sheila G.
	In: Learning and memory developments and intellectual disabilities / Lucas C. Eklund and Aron S. Nyman (eds.), Chapter 6, pp. 155-172 (2010)
	BASE
	Show details

9	When /b/ill with /g/ill becomes /d/ill: evidence for a lexical effect in audiovisual speech perception
	Barutchu, Ayla; Kiely, Patricia; Crewther, Sheila...
	In: The European journal of cognitive psychology. - Basingstoke : Psychology Press 20 (2008) 1, 1-11
	BLLDB
	OLC Linguistik
	Show details

10	When /b/ill with /g/ill becomes /d/ill: evidence for a lexical effect in audiovisual speech perception
	Barutchu, Ayla; Murphy, Melanie J.; Kiely, Patricia M....
	In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 20, no. 1 (2008), pp. 1-11 (2008)
	BASE
	Show details

11	"Wots that Werd?" : Pseudowords (non-words) may be a misleading measure of phonological skills in young learner readers
	Crewther, David P.; Crewther, Sheila G.; Thomson, Brenda
	In: Dyslexia. - Bracknell : British Dyslexia Association 12 (2006) 4, 289-299
	BLLDB
	OLC Linguistik
	Show details

12	Wots that werd? Pseudowords (non-words) may be a misleading measure of phonological skills in young learner readers.
	Thomson, Brenda.; Crewther, David P.; Crewther, Sheila.
	In: Dyslexia, 12(4): 289-299 (2006)
	BASE
	Show details

13	Wots that werd? Pseudowords (non-words) may be a misleading measure of phonological skills in young learner readers
	Thomson, Brenda; Crewther, David P.; Crewther, Sheila G.
	In: Dyslexia, Vol. 12, no. 4 (2006), pp. 289-299 (2006)
	BASE
	Show details

14	Measurement error : implications for diagnosis and discrepancy models of developmental dyslexia
	Crewther, Sheila G.; Crewther, David P.; Cotton, Sue M.
	In: Dyslexia. - Bracknell : British Dyslexia Association 11 (2005) 3, 186-202
	BLLDB
	OLC Linguistik
	Show details

15	Vision and learning to read
	Kiely, Patricia M.; Crewther, Sheila G.; Crewther, David P.
	In: Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Vol. 85, no. 4 (Jul 2002), pp. 260-262 (2002)
	BASE
	Show details

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern