DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 8 of 8

1
Exploring Morality in Argumentation ...
BASE
Show details
2
Knowledge Graphs meet Moral Values ...
BASE
Show details
3
Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences
Kobbe, Jonathan; Stuckenschmidt, Heiner; Hulpus, Ioana. - : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020
BASE
Show details
4
Exploring morality in argumentation
Hulpus, Ioana; Stuckenschmidt, Heiner; Kobbe, Jonathan. - : Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, 2020
BASE
Show details
5
Knowledge graphs meet moral values
Hulpus, Ioana; Kobbe, Jonathan; Stuckenschmidt, Heiner. - : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020
BASE
Show details
6
Exploiting Background Knowledge for Argumentative Relation Classification
Kobbe, Jonathan; Frank, Anette; Opitz, Juri; Becker, Maria; Stuckenschmidt, Heiner; Hulpus, Ioana. - : Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2019. : OASIcs - OpenAccess Series in Informatics. 2nd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2019), 2019
Abstract: Argumentative relation classification is the task of determining the type of relation (e.g., support or attack) that holds between two argument units. Current state-of-the-art models primarily exploit surface-linguistic features including discourse markers, modals or adverbials to classify argumentative relations. However, a system that performs argument analysis using mainly rhetorical features can be easily fooled by the stylistic presentation of the argument as opposed to its content, in cases where a weak argument is concealed by strong rhetorical means. This paper explores the difficulties and the potential effectiveness of knowledge-enhanced argument analysis, with the aim of advancing the state-of-the-art in argument analysis towards a deeper, knowledge-based understanding and representation of arguments. We propose an argumentative relation classification system that employs linguistic as well as knowledge-based features, and investigate the effects of injecting background knowledge into a neural baseline model for argumentative relation classification. Starting from a Siamese neural network that classifies pairs of argument units into support vs. attack relations, we extend this system with a set of features that encode a variety of features extracted from two complementary background knowledge resources: ConceptNet and DBpedia. We evaluate our systems on three different datasets and show that the inclusion of background knowledge can improve the classification performance by considerable margins. Thus, our work offers a first step towards effective, knowledge-rich argument analysis.
Keyword: argument classification; argument structure analysis; argumentative functions; background knowledge; commonsense knowledge relations; Data processing Computer science
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-103723
URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.LDK.2019.8
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2019/10372/
BASE
Hide details
7
Exploiting Background Knowledge for Argumentative Relation Classification ...
Kobbe, Jonathan; Opitz, Juri; Becker, Maria. - : Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik GmbH, Wadern/Saarbruecken, Germany, 2019
BASE
Show details
8
Exploiting background knowledge for argumentative relation classification
Kobbe, Jonathan; Opitz, Juri; Becker, Maria. - : Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2019
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
8
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern