| 1 |
The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0023-8309 ; Language and Speech ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03225622 ; Language and Speech, SAGE Publications (UK and US), 2021, ⟨10.1177/00238309211010862⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
The Respiratory Foundations of Spoken Language
|
|
|
|
In: EISSN: 2333-9691 ; Annual Review of Linguistics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02986713 ; Annual Review of Linguistics, Annual Reviews, 2021, 7 (1), pp.13-30. ⟨10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031720-103907⟩ ; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031720-103907 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Traitement de la cohésion en production de texte chez les élèves de 7 à 12 ans : approche de psychologie cognitive développementale
|
|
|
|
In: Cohérence et cohésion textuelles ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03120778 ; Nita Raluca; Caron Philippe; Vergez-Couret Marianne; Brunet Anthony; Kleiber Georges. Cohérence et cohésion textuelles, Éditions Lambert-Lucas, A paraître (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Reading Fluency in Children and Adolescents Who Stutter
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 12; Pages: 1595 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Exploring L2 English Learners’ Articulatory Problems Using a Read-Aloud Task ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The impact of lexical density in simultaneous interpreting of slide presentations: A replication
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Por (lo) tanto en “contextos reducidos” (I): análisis cuantitativo y formal ; Por (lo) tanto in “reduced contexts” (I): quantitive and formal analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Pausas em uma tarefa de tradução e percepção do nível de Dificuldade da Tarefa de Tradução
|
|
|
|
In: Domínios de Lingu@gem, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 690-711 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
La fonction Pragmatico-cognitive des pauses et des phénomènes d’hésitation dans une conversation téléphonique
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01684401 ; 2018 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Prosodic processing in people who do and do not stutter: Evidence from pause perception
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
"I think therefore I uh.m?" - a corpus-based study of syntactic and functional differences between "uh" and "uhm" in British English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Variations of chronometric measures of written production depending on clause packaging
|
|
|
|
In: CogniTextes, Vol 17 (2018) (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Le rôle de la pause dans l’acquisition de la première syntaxe en français
|
|
|
|
In: Langages, N 211, 3, 2018-08-29, pp.61-80 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Variation de la durée des pauses silencieuses : impact de la syntaxe, du style de parole et des disfluences
|
|
|
|
In: Langages, N 211, 3, 2018-08-29, pp.13-40 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Que cachent les pauses silencieuses en parole ? Une étude de cas
|
|
|
|
In: Langages, N 211, 3, 2018-08-29, pp.111-126 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Pausas sonoras y bilingüismo ; Filled pauses and bilingualism
|
|
|
|
In: Estudios de fonética experimental; 2018: Vol.: 27; p. 75-96 ; 1575-5533 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The sound of silence: the functions of gestures in pauses in native and non-native interaction
|
|
|
|
In: Why Gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01664504 ; Why Gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating , John Benjamins, pp.353-377, 2017, 9789027228499. ⟨10.1075/gs.7.17sta⟩ (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Um and Uh, and the Expression of Stance in Conversational Speech
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2017-08 ; Um and uh are some of the most frequent items in spoken American and British English (Biber et al., 1999). They have been traditionally treated as disfluencies but recent research has focused on their discursive functions and acoustic properties, and suggest that um and uh are not just filled pauses or random speech errors. At this stage, there is little agreement on whether they should be considered as by-products of the planning process (speech errors) or as pragmatic markers. In addition, most work on um and uh considers them to be the same variable, collapsing both into the same category. The present work investigates the discursive and the acoustic properties of um and uh in spontaneous speech with the aim of finding out if they occur in systematic ways and if they correlate with specific variables. The analysis of um and uh is conducted on two corpora, ATAROS and Switchboard, to determine how the markers are used in different spontaneous speech activities. The Switchboard corpus consists of phone conversations between strangers, which allow us to study how speakers use um and uh in this context. It has different transcript versions (original and corrected), which allows us to test how transcribers perceive the two markers by aligning the original transcript with the corrected one. The ATAROS corpus consists of collaborative tasks between strangers and it is annotated for stance strength and polarity, which allows us to investigate how um and uh relate to stance. The term stance refers to subjective spoken attitudes toward something (Haddington, 2004). Stance strength is the degree to which stance is expressed. Stance strength has four possible values: no stance, weak, moderate, and strong stance. Stance polarity is the direction of the expression of stance, and it can be positive, neutral, or negative. The results of this study show that um and uh have di erent discursive cues, which cor- relate with variables such as speaker, speaker gender, speaker involvement, and naturalness of the conversation. Um and uh have di erent acoustic cues, which show some correlation with di erent degrees of stance and with stance polarity for di erent acoustic properties depending on the marker. The presence and the position of um and uh in utterances af- fect the likelihood of an utterance to be marked with a certain degree or polarity of stance. These findings are incorporated in a classification experiment, to test whether information pertaining to um and uh can be used to train a classifier to automatically label stance. The results of this experiment reveal that um and uh are valuable word unigram features and indicate that the position features and certain acoustic features increase the performance of the system in predicting stance. The results also indicate that um is a slightly more im- portant word unigram feature than uh, that features pertaining to um are more informative in the prediction of binary stance, and that features relating to uh are more informative to predict three-way stance strength. The findings confirm that um and uh are distinct entities. The discourse and acoustic features of um and uh are different. The marker um tends to vary to a greater extent than the marker uh. Transcribers perceive um more reliably than uh. Um and uh are relevant word unigram features. Features associated to um increase accuracy over those related to uh to predict binary stress, and features associated to uh increase accuracy over those associated to um to predict three-way stance strength. The work presented in this dissertation provides support to show um and uh are not just fillers or disfluencies, but rather that they have a wide range of uses, from fillers to pragmatic and stance markers.
|
|
Keyword:
disfluencies; filled pauses; Linguistics; spontaneous speech; stance; uh; um
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/40619
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Rhythmical specificities of political speech. The case of François Hollande ; Spécificités du rythme de la parole politique. Le cas de François Hollande
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0557-2665 ; Romanica Wratislaviensia ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02289512 ; Romanica Wratislaviensia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2016, n° 63, p. 145-155 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
