DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Hits 81 – 88 of 88

81
38 Wednesday, March 14: Poster Abstracts
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_38.pdf
BASE
Show details
82
116 Thursday, March 15: Poster Abstracts Word-order uncertainty induces alternative, non-veridical structures in online comprehension
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_116.pdf
BASE
Show details
83
50 Wednesday, March 14: Poster Abstracts
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_50.pdf
BASE
Show details
84
A Bayesian belief-updating model of syntactic expectation adaptation
In: http://www.hlp.rochester.edu/publications/KleinschmidtFineJaeger_CUNY2012.pdf
Abstract: Work over the last 20 years has provided evidence that syntactic comprehension is affected by comprehenders’ language experience: Structures that are more expected in their context are processed faster [1-2]. Comprehenders achieve this by integrating information from multiple cues [1,3]. Recent work further suggests that how these cues are combined into syntactic expectations can change due to recent experience [2,4-6]. However, there are so far no models of how comprehenders adapt to changes in the informativity of the cues that explain the observed ability to adapt syntactic expectations. Here we develop a Bayesian belief-updating model which captures the qualitative behavioral effects found in a recent study on cue-combination and syntactic adaptation [6]. Via a Dirichlet-multinomial model, this model formalizes the following related claims: that comprehenders (a) track the co-occurrence of syntactic structures— here, sentence complement (SC) or direct object (DO) continuations, as in (1)—and cues providing information about the probability of those structures (here, the verbs and the complementizer that), and (b) use these continuously updated estimates to generate expectations about upcoming syntactic structures. In a between-subjects, multi-visit self-paced reading experiment (pre-test session, three exposure sessions over 6 days, post-test session 2 days after last exposure session, cf.[5]), we previously investigated [6] whether comprehenders update their estimates of the probability of the syntactic structures in (1) conditioned on the verb
Keyword: adaptation; computational modeling; English; self-paced reading; sentence comprehension
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.379.3950
http://www.hlp.rochester.edu/publications/KleinschmidtFineJaeger_CUNY2012.pdf
BASE
Hide details
85
The Prior Knowledge Effect on the Processing of Vague Discourse in Mandarin Chinese
In: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/O/O11/O11-2006.pdf
BASE
Show details
86
68 Wednesday, March 14: Poster Abstracts A Bayesian belief-updating model of syntactic expectation adaptation
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_68.pdf
BASE
Show details
87
Speech Act Recognition in Conversation: Experimental Evidence
In: http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2012/papers/0282/paper0282.pdf
BASE
Show details
88
Concurrent Memory Load, Working Memory Span, and Morphological Processing in L1 and L2 English
Dronjic, Vedran. - NO_RESTRICTION
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
88
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern