DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 9 of 9

1
The brain signature of emerging reading in two contrasting languages
In: ISSN: 1053-8119 ; EISSN: 1095-9572 ; NeuroImage ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03378004 ; NeuroImage, Elsevier, 2021, 225, pp.117503. ⟨10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117503⟩ (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Neural patterns of word processing differ in children with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficit
In: Brain Struct Funct (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Reading and spelling skills are differentially related to phonological processing: Behavioral and fMRI study
BASE
Show details
4
Children With Dyslexia and Familial Risk for Dyslexia Present Atypical Development of the Neuronal Phonological Network
Łuniewska, Magdalena; Chyl, Katarzyna; Dębska, Agnieszka. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2019
BASE
Show details
5
Neither action nor phonological video games make dyslexic children read better [<Journal>]
Łuniewska, Magdalena [Verfasser]; Chyl, Katarzyna [Sonstige]; Dębska, Agnieszka [Sonstige].
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
6
Neither action nor phonological video games make dyslexic children read better
Łuniewska, Magdalena; Chyl, Katarzyna; Dębska, Agnieszka. - : Nature Publishing Group, 2018
BASE
Show details
7
Neither action nor phonological video games make dyslexic children read better
Łuniewska, Magdalena; Chyl, Katarzyna; Dębska, Agnieszka. - : Nature Publishing Group UK, 2018
BASE
Show details
8
Performance of Language-Coordinated Collective Systems: A Study of Wine Recognition and Description
Zubek, Julian; Denkiewicz, Michał; Dębska, Agnieszka. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2016
BASE
Show details
9
Pooling the ground: understanding and coordination in collective sense making
Abstract: Common ground is most often understood as the sum of mutually known beliefs, knowledge, and suppositions among the participants in a conversation. It explains why participants do not mention things that should be obvious to both. In some accounts of communication, reaching a mutual understanding, i.e., broadening the common ground, is posed as the ultimate goal of linguistic interactions. Yet, congruent with the more pragmatic views of linguistic behavior, in which language is treated as social coordination, understanding each other is not the purpose (or not the sole purpose) of linguistic interactions. This purpose is seen as at least twofold (e.g., Fusaroli et al., 2014): to maintain the systemic character of a conversing dyad and to organize it into a functional synergy in the face of tasks posed for a dyadic system as a whole. It seems that the notion of common ground is not sufficient to address the latter character of interaction. In situated communication, in which meaning is created in a distributed way in the very process of interaction, both common (sameness) and privileged (diversity) information must be pooled task-dependently across participants. In this paper, we analyze the definitions of common and privileged ground and propose a conceptual extension that may facilitate a theoretical account of agents that coordinate via linguistic communication. To illustrate the usefulness of this augmented framework, we apply it to one of the recurrent issues in psycholinguistic research, namely the problem of perspective-taking in dialog, and draw conclusions for the broader problem of audience design.
Keyword: Psychology
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426087
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224066
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01233
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
8
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern