Home
Catalogue search
Refine your search:
Keyword
Creator / Publisher:
Parsons, S (5)
Law, J (3)
Rush, R (3)
Schoon, I (3)
Parsons, S. (2)
Aczel, B (1)
Agostini, V (1)
Al-Hoorie, AH (1)
AlDoh, A (1)
Albayrak-Aydemir, N (1)
more
Year
Medium
Type
BLLDB-Access
Search in the Catalogues and Directories
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
Sort by
creator [A → Z]
'
creator [Z → A]
'
publishing year ↑ (asc)
'
publishing year ↓ (desc)
'
title [A → Z]
'
title [Z → A]
'
Simple Search
Hits 1 – 7 of 7
1
A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms
Parsons, S
;
Azevedo, F
;
Elsherif, MM
. - : Nature Research, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Instantiating metalevel argumentation frameworks
Young, A.P.
;
Kokciyan, N.
;
Sassoon, I.
. - : IOS Press, 2018
BASE
Show details
3
The relationship between gender, receptive vocabulary, and literacy from school entry through to adulthood.
Law, J
;
Rush, R
;
Parsons, S
...
In: Int J Speech Lang Pathol , 15 (4) pp. 407-415. (2013) (2013)
BASE
Show details
4
Long-term outcomes for children with early language problems: Beating the odds
Parsons, S
;
Schoon, I
;
Rush, R
...
In: Children and Society , 25 (3) pp. 202-214. (2011) (2011)
BASE
Show details
5
Long-term Outcomes for Children with Early Language Problems: Beating the Odds
Parsons, S.
;
Schoon, I.
;
Rush, R.
. - 2011
BASE
Show details
6
Childhood language skills and adult literacy: a 29-year follow-up study.
Schoon, I
;
Parsons, S
;
Rush, R
...
In: Pediatrics , 125 (3) e459-e466. (2010) (2010)
BASE
Show details
7
Dialectical argumentation for reasoning about chemical carcinogenicity
McBurney, P
;
Parsons, S
. - : Oxford University Press, 2001
Abstract:
We aim to build intelligent systems which can reason autonomously about the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Scientific debates in this area draw on evidence from multiple, and often conflicting sources, both theoretical and experimental, and participants use various modes of inferential reasoning. In seeking to automate such reasoning, we have first articulated precisely the multiple modes of inference used when an assertion of human carcinogenicity is made from experimental animal evidence. Because such inferences are often contested, scientific debate in this domain can be vigorous. To model such debates, we propose the use of a form of dialectical argumentation, drawing on Habermas' philosophy of Discourse Ethics [9] and Pera's philosophy of science [18]. The resulting formalism permits the representation of uncertainty and disagreement regarding the modes of inference used, as well as the claims being asserted.
Keyword:
Articles
URL:
http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/9/2/175
https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/9.2.175
BASE
Hide details
Mobile view
All
Catalogues
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
0
IDS Mannheim
0
OLC Linguistik
0
UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog
0
DNB Subject Category Language
0
Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft
0
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS)
0
Bibliographies
BLLDB
0
BDSL
0
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
0
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
0
IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen
0
IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen
0
IDS OBELEX meta
0
MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection
0
MPI for Psycholinguistics
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
Annohub
0
Online resources
Link directory
0
Journal directory
0
Database directory
0
Dictionary directory
0
Open access documents
BASE
7
Linguistik-Repository
0
IDS Publikationsserver
0
Online dissertations
0
Language Description Heritage
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik
|
Imprint
|
Privacy Policy
|
Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern