• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Pritchard, M. (27)
    • Dipper, L. (22)
    • Cocks, Naomi (9)
    • Cocks, N. (8)
    • Cruice, M. (8)
    • Morgan, G. (8)
    • Hilari, K. (5)
    • Botting, N. (4)
    • Boyle, M. (4)
    • Marshall, J. (4)
    •   more
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 Hits 1 – 20 of 27 1 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Hersh, D.; Scarth, L.; Bannister, J.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021 BASE Show details 2 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Cruice, M.; Pritchard, M.; Bannister, J.... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021) BASE Show details 3 Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base Dipper, L.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.; Botting, N.; Hersh, D.; Pritchard, M.; Cruice, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 Abstract: Background Improved discourse production is a priority for all key stakeholders in aphasia rehabilitation. A Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for aphasia found speech and language therapy treatment to be effective for improving the ability to communicate in everyday interaction. However, this large-scale review did not focus exclusively on treatment for discourse production and did not include other treatment research designs. Thus, the extent of the evidence base addressing discourse interventions is currently unclear. Objective The present study undertakes the first systematic review of research on treatment for discourse production in aphasia, appraises the quality of the evidence base; characterises the methods for measuring outcomes; and describes discourse treatment in terms of both content and efficacy. Design Scopus, Medline, and EmBase databases were searched, providing 334 records. Twenty-five studies (reporting on 127 participants) met inclusion criteria and were reviewed with the following research questions: What is the quality of the study designs used? How complete is the intervention reporting? What is the range, type, and content of outcome measures used? What is the range, type, and content of discourse treatments reported to date? Are discourse treatments efficacious? Results Seven of the 25 studies met the criteria for quality review, with 3 RCTs scoring moderately well and 3 (of 4) case studies scoring moderate-low. Most studies had adequate levels of completeness of treatment reporting, with 3 scoring highly. There were 514 different outcome measures reported across the 25 studies, with measures of words-in-discourse the most common. Studies were grouped into six treatment categories: “word production in discourse”, “sentence production in discourse”, “discourse macrostructure”, “discourse scripts”, “multi-level”, and “no consensus”. Twenty-two studies reported post-treatment gains, most commonly noted in increased word production. Changes in sentence production and discourse macrostructure were present but infrequently assessed. Conclusions Discourse treatment is an emerging field of research. Despite limitations in the evidence base, there are clear positive signs that discourse treatment is efficacious. There is emerging evidence for beneficial effects on word and sentence production in discourse, for improved discourse macrostructure, and for treatments working at multiple levels of language. To strengthen the evidence in this field and improve outcomes for people with aphasia, we need more discourse treatment research using an explicit theoretical rationale, high-quality study designs, more complete reporting, and agreed treatment and assessment methods. Keyword: P Philology. Linguistics; RC Internal medicine URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/24272/ https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/24272/3/Dipper%20at%20al.%202020.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765305 BASE Hide details 4 UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation Cruice, M.; Botting, N.; Marshall, J.. - : Wiley, 2020 BASE Show details 5 Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries Trebilcock, M.; Worrall, L.; Ryan, B.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2019 BASE Show details 6 Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, Naomi. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018 BASE Show details 7 Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia Cocks, Naomi; Byrne, S.; Pritchard, M.. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018 BASE Show details 8 Autobiographical memory in aphasia: an exploratory study Pritchard, M.; Dipper, L.; Salis, C.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2018 BASE Show details 9 Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia Cocks, N.; Byrne, S.; Pritchard, M.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018 BASE Show details 10 How do speakers with and without aphasia use syntax and semantics across two discourse genres? Walkden, E.; Dipper, L.; Cruice, M.. - : Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2018 BASE Show details 11 Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia Hilari, K.; Galante, L.; Huck, Anneline. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018 BASE Show details 12 Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, N.. - : Wiley, 2018 BASE Show details 13 Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, Naomi. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2017 BASE Show details 14 Reviewing the Quality of Discourse Information Measures in Aphasia Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, N.. - : Wiley, 2017 BASE Show details 15 Language and iconic gesture use in procedural discourse by speakers with aphasia Cocks, Naomi; Morgan, G.; Dipper, L.. - 2015 BASE Show details 16 The language–gesture connection: Evidence from aphasia Dipper, L.; Morgan, G.; Cocks, Naomi. - 2015 BASE Show details 17 The language-gesture connection: Evidence from aphasia Morgan, G.; Dipper, L.; Cocks, N.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2015 BASE Show details 18 Language and Iconic Gesture Use in Procedural Discourse by Speakers with Aphasia Morgan, G.; Dipper, L.; Pritchard, M.. - : Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015 BASE Show details 19 The benefits of a 5-day dysphagia intensive placement Cocks, Naomi; Harding, C.; Pritchard, M.. - : Informa Healthcare, 2014 BASE Show details 20 The benefits of a 5-day dysphagia intensive placement Cocks, N.; Harding, C.; Pritchard, M.. - : INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2014 BASE Show details Page: 1 2

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 27 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0