Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Hits 1 – 20 of 20

1	Domain-aware ontology matching ...
	Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021
	BASE
	Show details

2	Domain-aware ontology matching
	Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021
	BASE
	Show details

3	A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks.
	Hsu, Nina S; Jaeggi, Susanne M; Novick, Jared M. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2017
	BASE
	Show details

4	Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation ...
	Heffner, Christopher Cullen. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2017
	BASE
	Show details

5	Nonmusical Correlates of Musical Ability
	Swaminathan, Swathi. - 2017
	BASE
	Show details

6	Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation
	Heffner, Christopher Cullen. - 2017
	BASE
	Show details

7	Language modularity
	Harris, Lindsay N., 1979--; Lech, Iwona B.. - 2016
	BASE
	Show details

8	Further Exploring Processing Differences Between Geometric Shapes and Shape Words
	Scordas, Chelsea V.
	In: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2016)
	BASE
	Show details

9	Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora
	Adger, D; Svenonius, P. - 2016
	BASE
	Show details

10	Attention and executive control during lexical processing in aphasia
	Evans, William Streicher. - 2015
	BASE
	Show details

11	Using a Delayed Match-to-Samples Task to Investigate the Isolated Processing of Geometric Shapes and Their Corresponding Shape Words
	Edwards, Joshua E
	In: Georgia Southern University Research Symposium (2015)
	BASE
	Show details

12	Resisting Everything Except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain-Specific Impulsivity
	Tsukayama, Eli
	In: Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations (2012)
	BASE
	Show details

13	Comparison of Instrumentalists and Vocalists on a Lexical Tone Perception Task
	Kirkham, Joseph. - 2011
	BASE
	Show details

14	The Contribution of Domain Specificity in the Highly Modular Mind
	Barcelo Aspeitia, Axel; Erana, Angeles; Stainton, Robert J.
	In: Robert J. Stainton (2010)
	BASE
	Show details

15	How Does the Mind Do Literary Work?
	S. Versace; G. Thoms. - 2009
	Abstract: Literary linguistics assumes the forms of literature emerge from the human capacity for language. In this view, the regularities and peculiarities of literary form can be captured by the machinery of linguistic theory. This paper argues against this assumption, considering evidence from literary forms that do not generalise to the formalisms of linguistic theory. Instead, we argue that literary forms are related to, but distinct from, the linguistic system, and that their diversity requires a clear-cut distinction between the different domains. To understand how literary forms may require specific systems, we first discuss a number of mismatches between metrical and linguistic form (here, mainly phonological and semantic form). In our proposal, they all constitute evidence for the domain specificity of meter. Following Fabb & Halle (2008), we then show that metricality is best captured by form-specific computations, rather than by regular phonological processes. The empirical advantages of this theory are finally shown by the scansion of loose meters, which the extra-linguistic metrical system explain in a way that strictly phonological systems cannot (Fabb 2008). We then consider whether syntax may be given a similar explanation. The syntax of poetic texts can be highly unusual, often contrived to meet the demands of formal characteristics like metricality or parallelism. As with meter, these literary forms are often analysed as products of a `poetic syntax' (Fowler 1966; Austin 1984; Fitzgerald 2007), a variation on the standard syntax; however, we show that these systems cannot generate the variety of syntactic forms found in literary texts. Instead we demonstrate that these forms are generated by a separate mental system which obeys general principles of mental computation. This system is shown to be removed from syntax just like the metrical system is removed from phonology. To conclude, we consider the possible relationship between these two extralinguistic mental systems. The evidence discussed provides a clear indication that literary linguistics need not assume that the forms of literature are a natural outgrowth of linguistic systems. The variety of forms in literature indicate an ontologically radical theory of how the mind processes literature has significant advantages, both empirically, in accounting for a greater range of forms, and theoretically, in opening the way towards a more coherent theory of literary form. We finally propose that a theory of literary cognition must develop into a modular approach to forms. References Austin, T., 1984. "Language crafted: a linguistic theory of poetic syntax." Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Fabb, N., 2008. "What is a line of verse?." Paper delivered at ESSE 2008, Aarhus. Fabb, N., M. Halle, 2008. "Meter in poetry: a new theory". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fitzgerald, C., 2007. "An optimality treatment of syntactic inversions in English verse", Language Sciences Vol. 29, pp. 203-217. Fowler, R., 1966. "Essays on style and language: linguistic and critical approaches to literary style". London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Hanson, Kristin & Paul Kiparsky. 1996. "A parametric theory of poetic meter", Language 72, 2: 287-335. Hayes Bruce. 1989. "The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter". In Paul Kiparsky and Gilbert Youmans, eds., Rhythm and Meter, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 201-260. Hayes, Bruce. 2000. "Faithfulness and Componentiality in Metrics". To appear in The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, ed. by Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas. Cambridge: MIT Press. Nespor, M., I. Vogel. 1986 "Prosodic Phonology". Dordrecht, Foris.
	Keyword: domain specificity; meter; modular approach; poetic grammar; syntax
	URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/64061
	BASE
	Hide details

16	Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not
	Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda...
	In: Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John; & Miller, Michael B.(2006). Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1, 196 - 219. UC Santa Barbara: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c53x1nx (2006)
	BASE
	Show details

17	Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories
	Laws, K.R.. - 2004
	BASE
	Show details

18	The Case for Modularity: Sin or Salvation?
	Atran, Scott
	In: Evolution and Cognition ; https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000135 ; Evolution and Cognition, 2001, 7 (1), pp.46-55 (2001)
	BASE
	Show details

19	Grammatical knowledge vs. syntactic processing in the human brain
	Evelina Fedorenko Nancy Kanwisher
	In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf
	BASE
	Show details

20	How Does the Mind Work? Insights from Biology
	Gary Marcus
	In: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/marcusArticles/Marcus 2009 topics.pdf
	BASE
	Show details

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern