| 2 |
Training preservice SLPs’ family-centered skills (Mandak et al., 2020)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Decomposing cornering effects: an experimental study [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 60 (2018), 175-190
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
A unified semantics for the Japanese Q-particle ka in indefinites, questions and disjunctions
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 14 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Alternatives in Semantics
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158546 ; Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, 9780230314344 ; https://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/alternatives-in-semantics-anamaria-falaus/?K=9780230314344 (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Introduction : Alternatives in semantics and pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: Alternatives in Semantics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158558 ; Alternatives in Semantics, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1-35, 2013, Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, 9780230314344 ; https://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/alternatives-in-semantics-anamaria-falaus/?K=9780230314344 (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Question(s) de choix : quelques exemples de parcours interrogatif
|
|
|
|
In: Geneviève Girard-Gillet (éd.) Parcours linguistiques -- Domaine anglais ; 44ème Congrès de la SAES ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00661989 ; 44ème Congrès de la SAES, May 2004, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France. pp.21-37 (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Disjunction, focus, and scope
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistic Inquiry ; 35 (2004), 2. - S. 179-217. - ISSN 0024-3892 (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A Question of Case
|
|
|
|
In: Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics, Vol 31, Iss 4 (2004) (2004)
|
|
Abstract:
In this paper I investigate a seemingly optional variation between accusative and partitive case in Finnish in yes/no questions and certain kinds of negative contexts. I discuss two possible approaches: (i) the focus/background approach, which argues that the presence or absence of a focus/background partition guides the case alternation, and (ii) the negative polarity item (NPI) approach, which argues that the ‘optional’ partitive case is NPI-like. This second approach is built on the observation that contexts in which the alternation is licensed are also contexts which license NPI ‘anyone’ in Finnish. In addition, in the second part of the paper, I discuss how these hypotheses fit in with the semantic consequences of accusative and partitive case interacting with two types of disjunction in yes/no and alternative questions.
|
|
Keyword:
Accusative; Alternative Questions; Finnish Language; Focus; Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar; Negative Polarity Items; P101-410; Partitive
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.7557/12.33
https://doaj.org/article/bb9e5cb79c6c42e0a6dfaa011231a289
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
