| 1 |
Is Phonology Embodied? Evidence from Mechanical Stimulation
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Phonology and phonetics—linked, but distinct: Evidence from dyslexia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Infants differentially extract rules from language
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
Infants readily extract linguistic rules from speech. Here, we ask whether this advantage extends to linguistic stimuli that do not rely on the spoken modality. To address this question, we first examine whether infants can differentially learn rules from linguistic signs. We show that, despite having no previous experience with a sign language, six-month-old infants can extract the reduplicative rule (AA) from dynamic linguistic signs, and the neural response to reduplicative linguistic signs differs from reduplicative visual controls, matched for the dynamic spatiotemporal properties of signs. We next demonstrate that the brain response for reduplicative signs is similar to the response to reduplicative speech stimuli. Rule learning, then, apparently depends on the linguistic status of the stimulus, not its sensory modality. These results suggest that infants are language-ready. They possess a powerful rule system that is differentially engaged by all linguistic stimuli, speech or sign.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625613
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501030/
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99539-8
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Public misconceptions about dyslexia: The role of intuitive psychology
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Commentary: “An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind”—UG Is Still a Viable Hypothesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
