1 |
DDL is dead? Long live DDL! Expanding the boundaries of data-driven learning.
|
|
|
|
In: Discovering language: Learning and affordance ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03506624 ; Discovering language: Learning and affordance, In press (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Gender-preferential language use in L1 and L2 argumentative essays? Evidence against lists of ‘gendered’ language features
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Referential movement in L2 vs. heritage Korean: a learner corpus study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Taking DDL online: Designing, implementing and evaluating a SPOC on data-driven learning for tertiary L2 writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Validating an L2 academic group oral assessment: insights from a spoken learner corpus
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Definite article bridging relations in L2: A learner corpus study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Characterising postgraduate students’ corpus query and usage patterns for disciplinary data-driven learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Learning the language of dentistry: disciplinary corpora in the teaching of English for Specific Academic Purposes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
APPRAISAL resources in L1 and L2 argumentative essays: A contrastive learner corpus-informed study of evaluative stance
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Martin and White’s (2005) appraisal theory explores the ways interpersonal meanings are expressed when researching evaluative aspects of language use. Despite numerous discourse analyses using appraisal, there is little research comparing appraisal resources deployed by L1 and L2 English writers in discourse produced under the same conditions and on the same task. 60 argumentative essays across two writing prompts were collected from a larger corpus of Asian L2 English writing, to which the present study applied the appraisal model as part of a Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (Granger, 1996, 2015)comparing the evaluative stance construed in L1 and L2 English texts. The findings show significant variation in the evaluative resources used in L1 and L2 essays. L1 English writers demonstrated a consistent reliance on engagement resources in general and showed a heavier dependence on these devices than L2 writers in their essays. In contrast, Hong Kong L2 English writers used a significantly higher frequency of negative attitude resources than L1 English writers. These contrastive corpus-informed results offer further evidence of differences in L1/L2 written evaluative stance that educators may take into account during writing instruction.
|
|
Keyword:
P Philology. Linguistics; PE English; Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
|
|
URL: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/115784/1/Lam%20Crosthwaite.pdf http://orca.cf.ac.uk/115784/ https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: the case of L2 Mandarin
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Exploring stance in the manifestos of 3 candidates for the Hong Kong Chief Executive election 2017: Combining CDA and corpus-like insights
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Review of Schubert, Christoph & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, eds. (2016) Variational text linguistics: revisiting register in English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|