1 |
Modified spectral tilt affects infants' native-language discrimination of approximants and vowels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Modified spectral tilt affects infants' native-language discrimination of approximants and vowels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Bilateral cochlear implants in long-term and short-term deafness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Signs of binaural processing with bilateral cochlear implants in the case of someone with more than 50 years of unilateral deafness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noise
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Who uses television captions, when, and why? Analyses based on the Australian Television Caption Users Survey
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students’ Classroom Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults: effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension
|
|
|
|
In: Faculty of Education - Papers (Archive) (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults : effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults: effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Caption rate and text reduction are factors that appear to affect the comprehension of captions by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. These 2 factors are confounded in everyday captioning; rate (in words per minute) is slowed by text reduction. In this study, caption rate and text reduction were manipulated independently in 2 experiments to assess any differential effects and possible benefits for comprehension by deaf and hard-of-hearing adults. Volunteers for the study included adults with a range of reading levels, self-reported hearing status, and different communication and language preferences. Results indicate that caption rate (at 130, 180, 230 words per minute) and text reduction (at 84%, 92%, and 100% original text) have different effects for different adult users, depending on hearing status, age, and reading level. In particular, reading level emerges as a dominant factor: more proficient readers show better comprehension than poor readers and are better able to benefit from caption rate and, to some extent, text reduction modifications.
|
|
Keyword:
caption rate; captioning; comprehension; deaf and hard-of-hearing adults; text reduction
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/43506
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|