1 |
Exploring the Representations of Individual Entities in the Brain Combining EEG and Distributional Semantics
|
|
|
|
In: Front Artif Intell (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Coreference Resolution for the Biomedical Domain: A Survey ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Patterns of Lexical Ambiguity in Contextualised Language Models ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Patterns of Polysemy and Homonymy in Contextualised Language Models ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Assessing Polyseme Sense Similarity through Co-predication Acceptability and Contextualised Embedding Distance ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Free the Plural: Unrestricted Split-Antecedent Anaphora Resolution ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Anaphoric Zero Pronoun Identification: A Multilingual Approach ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Fake Opinion Detection: How Similar are Crowdsourced Datasets to Real Data?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Crowdsourcing and Aggregating Nested Markable Annotations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Crowdsourcing and Aggregating Nested Markable Annotations
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
One of the key steps in language resource creation is the identification of the text segments to be annotated, or markables, which depending on the task may vary from nominal chunks for named entity resolution to (potentially nested) noun phrases in coreference resolution (or mentions) to larger text segments in text segmentation. Markable identification is typically carried out semi-automatically, by running a markable identifier and correcting its output by hand–which is increasingly done via annotators recruited through crowdsourcing and aggregating their responses. In this paper, we present a method for identifying markables for coreference annotation that combines high-performance automatic markable detectors with checking with a Game-With-A-Purpose (GWAP) and aggregation using a Bayesian annotation model. The method was evaluated both on news data and data from a variety of other genres and results in an improvement on F1 of mention boundaries of over seven percentage points when compared with a state-of-the-art, domain-independent automatic mention detector, and almost three points over an in-domain mention detector. One of the key contributions of our proposal is its applicability to the case in which markables are nested, as is the case with coreference markables; but the GWAP and several of the proposed markable detectors are task and language-independent and are thus applicable to a variety of other annotation scenarios.
|
|
URL: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/25793/ http://repository.essex.ac.uk/25793/1/Madge2019Crowdsourcing.pdf https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1077
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
A Crowdsourced Corpus of Multiple Judgments and Disagreement on Anaphoric Interpretation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|