1 |
The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers
|
|
|
|
In: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Music is similar to language in terms of working memory interference
|
|
|
|
In: Psychon Bull Rev (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner's 40 year legacy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Semantic and Plausibility Preview Benefit Effects in English: Evidence from Eye Movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Data from: Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization. In Keith Rayner Eye Movements in Reading Data Collection. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Task Effects Reveal Cognitive Flexibility Responding to Frequency and Predictability: Evidence from Eye Movements in Reading and Proofreading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence from Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Bilinguals rarely produce words in an unintended language. However, we induced such intrusion errors (e.g., saying el instead of he) in 32 Spanish-English bilinguals who read aloud language-selective and language-mixed paragraphs with English or Spanish word order. Bilinguals produced language intrusions almost exclusively in language-mixed paragraphs, and most often when attempting to produce dominant-language targets (accent-only errors also exhibited reversed language dominance effects). Most intrusion errors occurred for function word targets, especially when they did not match paragraph language word order. Eye movements showed that fixating a word in the non-target language increased intrusion errors only for function word targets. Together, these results imply multiple mechanisms of language control, including (a) inhibition of the dominant language at both lexical (Green, 1998) and sublexical processing levels, (b) special retrieval mechanisms for function words in mixed-language utterances (Myers-Scotton, 1993), and (c) attention’s role in monitoring target language for match with intended language.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946281 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512661
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Parallel Object Activation and Attentional Gating of Information: Evidence from Eye Movements in the Multiple Object Naming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|